2009
DOI: 10.1002/ird.472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stages in the adoption of a wetting front detector

Abstract: The adoption of a new irrigation scheduling tool by irrigators in South Africa was evaluated while it was still in prototype form. A wetting front detector (WFD) is a funnel-shaped device, buried in the crop root zone, which provides a mechanical or electronic signal to the irrigator when a wetting front moves past it. There was a survey of 54 irrigators or their advisors, who participated voluntarily by evaluating the tool under their own conditions. The survey showed that all participants perceived the devic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wetting front detectors (WFDs) and Chameleon soil moisture sensors and readers were used in the project. The WFD is a funnel-shaped device which is buried in the soil (Stirzaker et al, 2010;Stirzaker, 2003). As water infiltrates the soil a wetting front is formed, which is the boundary between wet soil above and dry soil below.…”
Section: Soil Moisture and Nutrient Monitoring Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetting front detectors (WFDs) and Chameleon soil moisture sensors and readers were used in the project. The WFD is a funnel-shaped device which is buried in the soil (Stirzaker et al, 2010;Stirzaker, 2003). As water infiltrates the soil a wetting front is formed, which is the boundary between wet soil above and dry soil below.…”
Section: Soil Moisture and Nutrient Monitoring Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result indicated that the majority of farmers (60%) cited that the WFD as an irrigation‐scheduling tool had a relative advantage over their traditional practices. A study in South Africa showed similar results, in that more than 80% of the respondents felt that WFD had a relative advantage (Stirzaker et al, 2010). However, one‐third of respondents and 50% of non‐lead farmers were unsure about the relative advantage of the WFD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Detectors are usually placed in pairs, about one‐third and two‐thirds down the active root zone. When the soil is irrigated, the funnel ‘captures’ some water from the wetting front as it goes past (Stirzaker, 2003; Stirzaker et al, 2010). As the soil moisture exceeds field capacity, water will gravitationally drain, passing through a filter and into a reservoir.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sensors measure soil matric potential (SMP) or volumetric soil water content (VSWC). A useful and simple sensor, the "Full Stop sensor" can be used to determine when sufficient irrigation has been applied by indicating the arrival of the wetting front at a given depth (Charlesworth, 2005;Stirzaker et al, 2009).…”
Section: Use Of Soil Moisture Sensors To Assist With Irrigation Manag...mentioning
confidence: 99%