2021
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20202648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stage-specific action of Runx1 and GATA3 controls silencing of PU.1 expression in mouse pro–T cells

Abstract: PU.1 (encoded by Spi1), an ETS-family transcription factor with many hematopoietic roles, is highly expressed in the earliest intrathymic T cell progenitors but must be down-regulated during T lineage commitment. The transcription factors Runx1 and GATA3 have been implicated in this Spi1 repression, but the basis of the timing was unknown. We show that increasing Runx1 and/or GATA3 down-regulates Spi1 expression in pro–T cells, while deletion of these factors after Spi1 down-regulation reactivates its expressi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After T lineage commitment and passage through bselection, E proteins can regulate gene products that are not expressed at the DN stage, including CD4, TCRa, and Rorgt (7,(15)(16)(17). Thus, regulation of different suites of T cell genes at different stages of development is a key feature of E protein activity during T cell development, as has also been observed for GATA3 and Runx factors (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…After T lineage commitment and passage through bselection, E proteins can regulate gene products that are not expressed at the DN stage, including CD4, TCRa, and Rorgt (7,(15)(16)(17). Thus, regulation of different suites of T cell genes at different stages of development is a key feature of E protein activity during T cell development, as has also been observed for GATA3 and Runx factors (18,19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The majority of precommitment-specific binding sites for Runx factors (Group 1 sites) have been shown to be actual co-binding sites with PU.1 1, 13 . Besides PU.1, in later pro-T cells other TFs such as GATA3 and Bcl11b can also collaborate with Runx factors at different sites 32, 33 . Notably, the presence of PU.1 can redirect Runx1 occupancy to the PU.1 sites, while depleting Runx1 binding (“theft”) from alternative Runx sites 13 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2e). PU.1 ( Spi1 ) is normally repressed by Runx1 in Phase 2 only 1, 33 . Its expression was not affected by Runx1 overexpression at day 2 post-infection, but was significantly downregulated even in the DN1 population at day 4 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Runx transcription factors are also potent at counteracting the stem/progenitor module by repressing the majority of key transcription factor coding genes supporting this program ( Mef2c, Lmo2, Lyl1, Bcl11a, Tal1 , and Meis1 ) in a highly concentration-sensitive way ( 84 ). As the cells pass from Phase 1 to Phase 2, Runx1 begins to collaborate with GATA3 to repress Spi1 (PU.1) ( 51 , 210 ) and turns off the downstream target genes of PU.1 as well, Cd34 and Cd44 ( 51 ).…”
Section: Gene Regulatory Network Models For Early T Cell Development ...mentioning
confidence: 99%