1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980610)76:6<851::aid-ijc14>3.3.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stage and organ dependent effects of 1‐O‐hexyl‐2,3,5‐trimethylhydroquinone, ascorbic acid derivatives, N‐heptadecane‐8,10‐dione and phenylethyl isothiocyanate in a rat multiorgan carcinogenesis model

Abstract: The effects of 1-O-hexyl-2,3,5-trimethylhydroquinone (HTHQ), phenylethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC), 3-O-ethylascorbic acid, 3-O-dodecylcarbomethylascorbic acid and n-heptadecane-8,10-dione were analyzed in a rat multiorgan carcinogenesis model. Groups of 15 animals were given a single intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of diethylnitrosamine and 4 i.p. injections of N-methylnitrosourea as well as N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine in the drinking water during the first 2 weeks. Then 4 subcutaneous (s.c.) injectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are in line with our previous observations that 0.25% HTHQ weakly enhanced carcinogenesis in the tongue and forestomach, but not in the esophagus, in a rat medium term multi-organ model 30) and in an N-ethylnitrosourethane-initiated rat two-stage carcinogenesis model. 21) Furthermore, incidence of forestomach carcinomas was further increased by additional treatment with NaNO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results are in line with our previous observations that 0.25% HTHQ weakly enhanced carcinogenesis in the tongue and forestomach, but not in the esophagus, in a rat medium term multi-organ model 30) and in an N-ethylnitrosourethane-initiated rat two-stage carcinogenesis model. 21) Furthermore, incidence of forestomach carcinomas was further increased by additional treatment with NaNO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These oxidative phenomena may lead to necrotic cell death and thus damage to the surrounding cells. Although ITCs are promising and effective candidates as anticarcinogens, some ITCs showed enhancement of carcinogenicity or lack of chemopreventive effects in rat liver and kidney especially dosed at the post-initiation phase (52,53). It is very likely that the intracellular ROS generation plays an important role in unfavorable side effects of BITC on carcinogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6) Another synthetic phenolic antioxidant, BHA, a known forestomach carcinogen, promotes development of forestomach squamous cell carcinomas in rats pretreated with N-methyl-N′-nitro-Nnitrosoguanidine (MNNG) when given at 1%, 9) whereas catechol at 0.8% and tert-butylhydroquinone (TBHQ) at 1% only affected papillomas in multi-organ 10,11) models. In line with the present study, the same dose of HTHQ also increased the incidence and numbers of tongue papillary or nodular (PN) hyperplasias (P<0.001), and forestomach PN hyperplasias (P<0.01) in rats after initiation with ENUR (unpublished results).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HTHQ has the highest anti-mutagenic activity against Glu-P-1-induced mutagenesis 2) and chemopreventive effect against MeIQx-induced hepatocarcinogenesis among HTHQ, BHA, BHT, TBHQ, propyl gallate and α-tocopherol (unpublished results). In addition HTHQ inhibits colon 6) and mammary carcinogenesis 5) when given in the post-initiation stage in multi-organ and DMBA models, respectively. Thus, HTHQ still deserves consideration as a candidate chemopreventive agent suitable for human use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%