2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00138-017-0844-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staff-line detection and removal using a convolutional neural network

Abstract: Staff-lines removal is an important preprocessing stage for most Optical Music Recognition systems. Common procedures to solve this task involve image processing techniques. In contrast to these traditional methods based on hand-engineered transformations, the problem can also be approached as a classification task in which each pixel is labeled as either staff or symbol, so that only those that belong to symbols are kept in the image. In order to perform this classification we propose the use of Convolutional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Montagner et al [26] followed a similar approach but learning the parameters of the morphological image operators. Calvo-Zaragoza et al [27] used Support Vector Machines to classify pixels belonging to the categories staff or non-staff, which was later extended by incorporating the use of CNN [28] and Auto-Encoders [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Montagner et al [26] followed a similar approach but learning the parameters of the morphological image operators. Calvo-Zaragoza et al [27] used Support Vector Machines to classify pixels belonging to the categories staff or non-staff, which was later extended by incorporating the use of CNN [28] and Auto-Encoders [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison with Pixel method is also illustrative of the goodness of our proposal, since it demonstrates that the performance is not only achieved by using a supervised learning scheme (Pixel also does so) but because of the adequacy of the proposed model. [21] 83.01 2013 NUASI lin [3] 94.29 2008 NUASI skel [3] 93.34 2008 LRDE [11] 97.14 2014 INESC [10] 91.01 2009 NUS [9] 75.24 2012 Pixel [22] 95.04 2016 Image Operator [12] 97.96 2017 StaffNet [26] 97.87 2017 Baseline 97.31 -Our approach 99.32 - We also test the method using grayscale version of the scores. Our approach can easily be used to deal with grayscale images without any additional pre-processing steps like binarization.…”
Section: E Comparison With State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, much effort has been made to successfully solve this stage [24][25][26]. Recently, results have reached values closer to the optimum over standard benchmarks by using DL [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References Task [20][21][22][23] Pre-processing of music score images [24][25][26][27][28] Staff-line removal [29][30][31][32][33][34] Symbol classification [35][36][37][38][39] Detection, classification, and interpretation [40][41][42][43] OMR in mensural notation…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%