“…To assess the effectiveness of our proposed model in comparison to the state-of-the-art methods, we evaluated our method against various existing models on the CK+, DISFA, and BP4D datasets. The models considered for comparison include Zhang [5], LibreFace [65], FS [20], STRAL [30], IDEN [81], LGR [78], MCFE [79], LUO [83], CWCF [80], JAU [82] for BP4D and DISFA datasets, and JPML [84], Simge [85], Chen1 [41], Chen2 [41], Elef [86] for the CK+ dataset.…”
Section: A Au Detection Comparison On Ck+ Disfa and Bp4d Datasetsmentioning
Facial Action Unit (AU) detection is of major importance in a broad range of artificial intelligence applications such as healthcare, Facial Expression Recognition (FER), and mental state analysis. In this paper, we present an innovative, resource-efficient facial AU detection model, embedding both spatial and channel attention mechanisms into a convolutional neural network (CNN). Along with a unique data input system leveraging image data and binary-encoded AU activation labels, our model enhances AU detection capabilities while simultaneously offering interpretability for FER systems. In contrast to existing state-of-the-art models, our proposal's streamlined architecture, combined with superior performance, establishes it as an ideal solution for resource-limited environments like mobile and embedded systems with computational constraints. The model was trained and evaluated utilizing the BP4D, CK+, DISFA, FER2013+, and RAF-DB datasets, with the latter two being particularly significant as they represent wild datasets for facial expression recognition. These datasets encompass ground truth emotions matched with corresponding AU activations according to the Facial Action Coding System. Various metrics, including F1 score, accuracy, and Euclidean distance, showcase its effectiveness in AU detection and interpretability.
“…To assess the effectiveness of our proposed model in comparison to the state-of-the-art methods, we evaluated our method against various existing models on the CK+, DISFA, and BP4D datasets. The models considered for comparison include Zhang [5], LibreFace [65], FS [20], STRAL [30], IDEN [81], LGR [78], MCFE [79], LUO [83], CWCF [80], JAU [82] for BP4D and DISFA datasets, and JPML [84], Simge [85], Chen1 [41], Chen2 [41], Elef [86] for the CK+ dataset.…”
Section: A Au Detection Comparison On Ck+ Disfa and Bp4d Datasetsmentioning
Facial Action Unit (AU) detection is of major importance in a broad range of artificial intelligence applications such as healthcare, Facial Expression Recognition (FER), and mental state analysis. In this paper, we present an innovative, resource-efficient facial AU detection model, embedding both spatial and channel attention mechanisms into a convolutional neural network (CNN). Along with a unique data input system leveraging image data and binary-encoded AU activation labels, our model enhances AU detection capabilities while simultaneously offering interpretability for FER systems. In contrast to existing state-of-the-art models, our proposal's streamlined architecture, combined with superior performance, establishes it as an ideal solution for resource-limited environments like mobile and embedded systems with computational constraints. The model was trained and evaluated utilizing the BP4D, CK+, DISFA, FER2013+, and RAF-DB datasets, with the latter two being particularly significant as they represent wild datasets for facial expression recognition. These datasets encompass ground truth emotions matched with corresponding AU activations according to the Facial Action Coding System. Various metrics, including F1 score, accuracy, and Euclidean distance, showcase its effectiveness in AU detection and interpretability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.