2017
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-3125-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable water isotopes in the MITgcm

Abstract: Abstract. We present the first results of the implementation of stable water isotopes in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm). The model is forced with the isotopic content of precipitation and water vapor from an atmospheric general circulation model (NCAR IsoCAM), while the fractionation during evaporation is treated explicitly in the MITgcm. Results of the equilibrium simulation under pre-industrial conditions are compared to observational data and measurements of pla… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The climatological monthly isotopic composition of precipitation and water vapor was obtained from a water isotope‐enabled simulation with the Community Atmosphere Model version 3.0 (IsoCAM3.0, Tharammal et al, ) and are prescribed as boundary conditions for the water isotope module. The prescribed isotopic composition of precipitation was previously used by Völpel et al (), who compared it to observations from the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation and found a good agreement. The isotopic composition of river runoff is defined in the model by the isotopic composition of precipitation at the location of the river mouth because the model does not explicitly simulate the isotopic composition of precipitation over river catchment areas (Völpel et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The climatological monthly isotopic composition of precipitation and water vapor was obtained from a water isotope‐enabled simulation with the Community Atmosphere Model version 3.0 (IsoCAM3.0, Tharammal et al, ) and are prescribed as boundary conditions for the water isotope module. The prescribed isotopic composition of precipitation was previously used by Völpel et al (), who compared it to observations from the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation and found a good agreement. The isotopic composition of river runoff is defined in the model by the isotopic composition of precipitation at the location of the river mouth because the model does not explicitly simulate the isotopic composition of precipitation over river catchment areas (Völpel et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The prescribed isotopic composition of precipitation was previously used by Völpel et al (), who compared it to observations from the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation and found a good agreement. The isotopic composition of river runoff is defined in the model by the isotopic composition of precipitation at the location of the river mouth because the model does not explicitly simulate the isotopic composition of precipitation over river catchment areas (Völpel et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To implement the vertical dimension, we used an approach in which we first updated PLAFOM (hereafter referred to as PLAFOM2.0) by including light dependency for symbiontbearing planktonic foraminifera and then applied the previously used spatial parameterization of carbon biomass as a function of temperature, nutrition, and competition, together with light, on depth-resolved parameter fields. By combining PLAFOM2.0 with the CESM1.2(BGC) configuration (hereafter referred to as the CESM1.2(BGC+PLA) configuration), the vertical dimension can be resolved throughout the ocean, with 24 layers in the top 250 m. Thus, PLAFOM2.0, belonging to a suite of proxy system models (e.g., Pollard and Schulz, 1994;Schmidt, 1999;Fraile et al, 2008;Evans et al, 2013;Dee et al, 2015;Völpel et al, 2017), will aid the interpretation of paleoclimate reconstructions. In addition, PLAFOM2.0 has the potential to be used in a paleoclimate data assimilation framework (see, e.g., Goosse et al, 2010;Steiger et al, 2014;Dee et al, 2016;Hakim et al, 2016).…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%