2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable time step estimates for NURBS-based explicit dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated in the research paper of Adam et al [28], the explicit analysis may need an incredibly large number of time increments for the numerical model, leading to very long computation time for simulation of quasi-static problems (normally requiring more than ten seconds). The Abaqus documentation recommends two numerical techniques for faster solutions: a) time scaling and b) mass scaling.…”
Section: Explicit Model Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As stated in the research paper of Adam et al [28], the explicit analysis may need an incredibly large number of time increments for the numerical model, leading to very long computation time for simulation of quasi-static problems (normally requiring more than ten seconds). The Abaqus documentation recommends two numerical techniques for faster solutions: a) time scaling and b) mass scaling.…”
Section: Explicit Model Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This time increment is also associated with the material density, which may be utilized for the mass scaling approach [28].…”
Section: Explicit Model Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary the time integration strategy has to be improved because, to the authors knowledge, no method for mass matrix diagonalization for isogeometric elements exists which lead to accurate results for higher frequencies. Adam et al (2015) analyzes several lumping strategies, but for greater eigenfrequencies the eigenmodes show errors and the accuracy decreases. Although the memory cost is lower the computational time is not reduced compared to spectral finite elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the maximum stable time increment size for explicit time integration methods is tied to the minimum element-like dimension, the applicable time increment size is simultaneously increased. However, according to Adam et al (2015b) the maximum stable time step size could be increased even further due to the higher continuity. This could mean a significant reduction in computational time of explicit analysis.…”
Section: Isogeometric Analysis (Iga)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher continuity is also beneficial for the Galerkin method as the numerical integration need not be performed at most one element at a time (Hughes et al,6 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 2010; Schillinger et al, 2014;Adam et al, 2015b). Moreover, the smoothness of the interpolation functions makes collocation methods potentially a good alternative for solving the underlying partial differential equations.…”
Section: Isogeometric Analysis (Iga)mentioning
confidence: 99%