2002
DOI: 10.1038/nn0602-851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns

Abstract: During the viewing of certain patterns, widely known as ambiguous or puzzle figures, perception lapses into a sequence of spontaneous alternations, switching every few seconds between two or more visual interpretations of the stimulus. Although their nature and origin remain topics of debate, these stochastic switches are generally thought to be the automatic and inevitable consequence of viewing a pattern without a unique solution. We report here that in humans such perceptual alternations can be slowed, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
224
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 339 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
19
224
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) For fixed blank duration T of f , the average dominance duration decreases with increasing T on . These conclusions agree well with the available experimental results (Leopold et al, 2002;Orbach et al, 1966). We would like to note that when the stimulus turns on after the blank duration, the change itself is expected to cause a measurement.…”
Section: B Periodic Removal Of Stimulussupporting
confidence: 92%
“…(b) For fixed blank duration T of f , the average dominance duration decreases with increasing T on . These conclusions agree well with the available experimental results (Leopold et al, 2002;Orbach et al, 1966). We would like to note that when the stimulus turns on after the blank duration, the change itself is expected to cause a measurement.…”
Section: B Periodic Removal Of Stimulussupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The 'boosting' hypothesis provides a role for attention and consciousness [38] in perceptual organization, since it states that a potential perceptual organization is strengthened by being experienced. Importantly, it is sufficient to explain the phenomenon of 'perceptual stabilization' whereby the bistable interpretation that was experienced before the interruption of a stimulus is more likely to dominate when the stimulus reappears [19,20]. Imagine that, as is the case for many ambiguous stimuli, which percept is experienced first is random (both interpretations are equally likely, i.e.…”
Section: Appendix Mechanisms Of Plaid Multistabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dynamics are different from those observed in classic examples of visual bistability like binocular rivalry, ambiguous figures or apparent motion. In such instances, when both interpretations are equally likely, which percept is first is random (unless the stimulus was presented a short time before; in that case, 'perceptual stabilization' can occur [19,20]). When the stimulus is biased in favour of one interpretation (for example, higher contrast of the stimulus presented to one eye in binocular rivalry), the first percept typically corresponds to the biased interpretation [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this paradigm, it has been shown that the interval between stimuli strongly affects which percept will be dominant on subsequent presentation. Short stimulus intervals (less than 0.5 s) cause many perceptual alterations between subsequent presentations [14,19,23,24], whereas long intervals (greater than 1.0 s) stabilize perception into the same dominant percept for many subsequent presentations [14,19,[23][24][25]. While perceptual stabilization with long interruption intervals is sometimes referred to as perceptual memory, it is unclear whether any high-level memory processes are actually required.…”
Section: Temporal Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%