1985
DOI: 10.1016/0264-410x(85)90063-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable oil-in-water emulsions: preparation and use as vaccine vehicles for lipophilic adjuvants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of oil-in-water emulsion adjuvants, soybean, hexadecane, peanut, mineral, squalene, and squalane oils have been employed, although results are highly dependent on differences in emulsion preparation, antigen, and emulsifier, making comparison between different studies difficult, although squalene and especially squalane appeared to be potent substitutes for mineral oil [34-38]. Recent research using both water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions has examined MCT-based emulsions vs. mineral oil emulsions; the latter were more reactogenic and induced higher antibody titers [39], although the MCT-based emulsion caused a higher influx of macrophages [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of oil-in-water emulsion adjuvants, soybean, hexadecane, peanut, mineral, squalene, and squalane oils have been employed, although results are highly dependent on differences in emulsion preparation, antigen, and emulsifier, making comparison between different studies difficult, although squalene and especially squalane appeared to be potent substitutes for mineral oil [34-38]. Recent research using both water-in-oil and oil-in-water emulsions has examined MCT-based emulsions vs. mineral oil emulsions; the latter were more reactogenic and induced higher antibody titers [39], although the MCT-based emulsion caused a higher influx of macrophages [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least two reports describing the effective use of one of the most common nutritional supplementation emulsions, the soybean oil-based Intralipid®, as a vaccine formulation including antigen and additional immunostimulatory molecules (muramyl dipeptide or avridine) [34, 42]. Tsujimoto et al found that the soybean emulsion with an influenza vaccine elicited similar HAI titers to the control vaccine (in PBS); however, when an additional immunostimulant (muramyl dipeptide analogue) was present, the vaccine containing the emulsion appeared to elicit higher HAI titers than the vaccine containing immunostimulant without the soybean oil emulsion [42], although the physical interaction between the immunostimulant and the emulsion was not characterized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results were reported on the adjuvant activity of o/w emulsions stabilized by a combination of Tween 80/Span 80 surfactants and for which the degree of stability did not affect antibody response as long as an emulsion was formed; stable emulsions were as effective as unstable ones. 32 Moreover, experiments are currently underway to examine the influence, if any, of the degree of stability of o/w liposomal emulsions on their immunogenic properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is what Lynn Woodard [8] did at the University of Moscow (Idaho, USA) around 1980, paving the way to modern vaccine adjuvant technology. His work has been much used but was little recognized at the time.…”
Section: Woodard's Oil-in-water Emulsionsmentioning
confidence: 94%