2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.organomet.9b00026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Nickel(I) Complexes with Electron-Rich, Sterically-Hindered, Innocent PNP Pincer Ligands

Abstract: The electronic and steric properties of a new class of electron-rich and sterically hindered tertamethylated PNP pincer ligands (Me 4 PNP R = 2,6-bis[(dialkylphosphino)propyl]pyridine with R = i Pr, t Bu) are discussed. Introducing the methyl groups on the pincer arm prevents dearomatization of the pincer framework and increases the bulkiness and electron-donating capacity of the ligand. Highly reactive Ni I species are thus prevented from dimerizing and can be analyzed by a wide variety of spectroscopic metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The next biggest difference occurs in the Ni1‐Cl1 distance: the triclinic form measures 2.181 Å, slightly smaller than the average in the monoclinic form 2.185 Å. The Ni1‐Cl1 distances are at the longer end while the Ni1–P1 distances are at the shorter end of the ranges found in other (PNN)NiCl [ 26,28,29 ] or (PNP)NiCl [ 32,33,41 ] complexes. In 1‐Me , the five‐membered NC 2 PNi chelate ring adopts an envelope conformation (fold angles = 16.3° for P 1, 11.0° and 20.1° for rings involving Ni1 and N1a, respectively, in the monoclinic form) and the six‐membered NC 2 N 2 Ni chelate ring adopts a half‐boat conformation to give an overall structure that distinguishes the phenyl rings of the PPh 2 group (Figure 2, right), with a pseudoaxial ring (type A) being closer to the toluidinyl ring than the pseudoequatorial ring (type B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The next biggest difference occurs in the Ni1‐Cl1 distance: the triclinic form measures 2.181 Å, slightly smaller than the average in the monoclinic form 2.185 Å. The Ni1‐Cl1 distances are at the longer end while the Ni1–P1 distances are at the shorter end of the ranges found in other (PNN)NiCl [ 26,28,29 ] or (PNP)NiCl [ 32,33,41 ] complexes. In 1‐Me , the five‐membered NC 2 PNi chelate ring adopts an envelope conformation (fold angles = 16.3° for P 1, 11.0° and 20.1° for rings involving Ni1 and N1a, respectively, in the monoclinic form) and the six‐membered NC 2 N 2 Ni chelate ring adopts a half‐boat conformation to give an overall structure that distinguishes the phenyl rings of the PPh 2 group (Figure 2, right), with a pseudoaxial ring (type A) being closer to the toluidinyl ring than the pseudoequatorial ring (type B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Ligands L1 and L2 were prepared according to the literature procedure. 1 Synthesis of complexes 1, 2 2, 3 and 15, 4 was previously described in the literature.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures………………………………………………………………………2-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solids were filtered, washed twice with cold pentane and dried under high vacuum for 7 hours to obtain complex 3 as a yellow solid (108 mg, 82 % yield). NMR Characterization: 1 H NMR. (400 MHz, THF-d8, 23 ℃) δ 7.69 (t, 1H, J = 7.9 Hz, py-H), 7.08 (d, 2H, J = 7.9 Hz, py-H), ), 3.01 (m, 2H, i Pr-H), 2.49 (m, 2H, i Pr-H), 1.66 (m, 18H, i Pr-Me and P−C(Me)), 1.46 (dd, 6H, JHP = 10.9 Hz, JHH = 5.6 Hz, i Pr-Me), 1.15 (dd, 6H, JHP = 13.9 Hz, JHH = 7.3 Hz, i Pr-Me), 0.79 (dd, 6H, JHP = 13.9 Hz, JHH = 7.3 Hz, i Pr-Me), -14.60 (v.t, 1H, JHP = 16.1 Hz, Ru-H).…”
Section: Experimental Procedures………………………………………………………………………2-3mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations