Atmospheric Methane: Sources, Sinks, and Role in Global Change 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-84605-2_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Isotopes and Global Budgets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, isotopic enrichment of up to 16‰ associated with an enrichment factor (51) of 1.016 at seeps and with an enrichment factor of only 1.008 at off-seep sites has been observed below and in the chemocline. Previous studies also documented that microbial methane oxidation is the only plausible explanation for pronounced isotope frac- (2,51). In comparison, mixing processes could not lead to this enrichment due to the missing heavy ( 13 C-enriched) methane source at these relatively shallow depths (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Overall, isotopic enrichment of up to 16‰ associated with an enrichment factor (51) of 1.016 at seeps and with an enrichment factor of only 1.008 at off-seep sites has been observed below and in the chemocline. Previous studies also documented that microbial methane oxidation is the only plausible explanation for pronounced isotope frac- (2,51). In comparison, mixing processes could not lead to this enrichment due to the missing heavy ( 13 C-enriched) methane source at these relatively shallow depths (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The mean δD in methane from various sources has been estimated (wetlands: −380‰ [ Whiticar , 1993], −320 ± 20‰ [ Quay et al , 1999], −322 ± 30‰ [ Snover et al , 2000]) by simply averaging previously reported isotope data and applying this to the global methane budget. It is clear, however, that latitudinal variation in δD in methane should be taken into account for accurate estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of the model to this assumption depends on the initial amount of isotopic enrichment and the extent of isotopic dilution that occurs during the incubation. We have assumed the δ 13 C of methane produced by methanogens to be −60‰ (1.05 atom percent 13 C), a commonly observed, intermediate value within the observed range of −50 to −100‰ [ Whiticar , 1993]. At high enrichment levels, deviation from the assumed value within the observed range generates an error of approximately the same size as analytical error and is thus not important.…”
Section: Assumptions and Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%