1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03377-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Isotope Geochemistry

Abstract: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hoefs, Jochen.Stable isotope geochemistry/Jochen Hoefs. -4th. completely rev., updated, and en!. ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
549
1
32

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 730 publications
(604 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
22
549
1
32
Order By: Relevance
“…9) Formation in Gaspé Peninsula in Quebec . Magmatic fluids are typically characterized by a 18 O of +6 to +8‰ VSMOW (Hoefs, 2009). There is obducted ophiolite in the study area (Nicolas et al, 2008), but no magmatic intrusions that could explain the stable oxygen isotopic signature of the dolomite studied.…”
Section: Stratabound Dolomitementioning
confidence: 95%
“…9) Formation in Gaspé Peninsula in Quebec . Magmatic fluids are typically characterized by a 18 O of +6 to +8‰ VSMOW (Hoefs, 2009). There is obducted ophiolite in the study area (Nicolas et al, 2008), but no magmatic intrusions that could explain the stable oxygen isotopic signature of the dolomite studied.…”
Section: Stratabound Dolomitementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The calculated δ 13 C values of the fluid phase indicate a mixed carbon source, most likely from both "carbon of the homogenized Earth's crust" (δ 13 C = -5 to -8 ‰ PDB) averaged from various crustal sources during fluid evolution and carbon derived from oxidized organic matter (δ 13 C = -20 to -30 ‰ PDB). The negligible variations in fluid δ 13 C values can be explained by rock-buffered fluid system (Hoefs 1997).…”
Section: Trace Element Signature Of Hydrothermal Fluidmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…6) confirm the long-term stability of the samples: if the vials were not airtight, evaporation would have led to a preferential removal of isotopically light water molecules from the water samples due to their higher vapour pressure (e.g. Hoefs, 2015) and, consequently, to an increase in the δ 18 O value of the remaining water sample over time. Such a positive trend is not present in the data and the results from the repeated measurements agree well with the initial ones.…”
Section: First Field Test: Comparison Of Automatic and Manual Samplesmentioning
confidence: 68%