2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2063-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Fixation of Short-stem Femoral Implants in Patients 70 Years and Older

Abstract: Background Limitations of conventional uncemented femoral stems persist, including proximal-distal mismatch, nonideal load transfer, loss of bone, and difficulties with minimally invasive surgery. Metaphyseal-engaging shortstem implants have been designed to address these issues in THA. While these devices have been studied in younger patients, it is unclear whether they offer advantages in older patients. Questions/purposes We asked whether the stability and bony ingrowth of an off-the-shelf short stem in pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(84 reference statements)
2
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe several factors were responsible for our good results: improved design (the proximal-fitting design of the femoral stem including pronounced lateral flare, AP build-up, and a short and narrow polished distal end of the stem), surgical technique for implantation of the cementless stem, the strong trabecular bone in young patients, and use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. Our results are consistent with those from other studies [20,21,26,30,31,34] (Table 5). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe several factors were responsible for our good results: improved design (the proximal-fitting design of the femoral stem including pronounced lateral flare, AP build-up, and a short and narrow polished distal end of the stem), surgical technique for implantation of the cementless stem, the strong trabecular bone in young patients, and use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing. Our results are consistent with those from other studies [20,21,26,30,31,34] (Table 5). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Metaphyseal-engaging short stems provide theoretical benefits compared with conventional cementless stems, including avoiding proximal-distal mismatch, decreasing proximal stress shielding, and limiting perioperative fractures. Several studies show short-stem designs provide short-term fixation [32,34,38,39]. Since 1995, we have investigated the option of a short, metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless femoral component.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short stems potentially preserve more bone stock, improve proximal load transfer, optimize bone remodeling especially in the older population and decrease stress shielding [15,16]. Furthermore, short stems may be easier to insert through smaller, minimally invasive incisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Przy pra wi dło wej kwa li fi ka cji, im plan ty te mo gą być rów nież sto so wa ne u cho rych po 70 ro ku ży cia, za pew nia jąc sta bil ne osa dze nie im plan tu i do bre wyni ki kli nicz ne [18]. Jak wy ka zał ostat nio To ma szew ski i wsp.…”
Section: Wstępunclassified