2000
DOI: 10.1006/game.1998.0708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable Coalition Structures with Open Membership and Asymmetric Firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article is related to the literature on the noncooperative theory of endogenous formation of coalitions-the literature that deals with situations in which players first form coalitions and then, given the coalition structure determined, engage in noncooperative competition. Papers in this literature include Bloch (1995Bloch ( , 1996, Yi (1996Yi ( , 1997Yi ( , 1998, Konishi et al (1997), Belleflamme (2000), Yi and Shin (2000), and Morasch (2000). They concentrate on examining the equilibrium (or stable) structures of coalitions-the equilibrium numbers and the sizes of coalitions-in models with various applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article is related to the literature on the noncooperative theory of endogenous formation of coalitions-the literature that deals with situations in which players first form coalitions and then, given the coalition structure determined, engage in noncooperative competition. Papers in this literature include Bloch (1995Bloch ( , 1996, Yi (1996Yi ( , 1997Yi ( , 1998, Konishi et al (1997), Belleflamme (2000), Yi and Shin (2000), and Morasch (2000). They concentrate on examining the equilibrium (or stable) structures of coalitions-the equilibrium numbers and the sizes of coalitions-in models with various applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the benefits of cooperation increases linearly with the size of the coalition and, therefore, in an open membership game there is no reason to remain out of the industry‐wide association of firms. Belleflamme () shows that this result extends to the case with asymmetric associations but not to the case with symmetric associations and asymmetric firms. In particular, when firms obtain different benefits in joining an association, several associations might form or a pure strategy Nash equilibrium coalition structure might even fail to exists.…”
Section: Extensionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This important property has been studied under different names ["orthogonality" in Guesnerie and Oddou (1988), "games without externalities" in Bloch (1996), or "games without spillovers" in Konishi, Le Breton and Weber (1997e)]. 4 It obviously rules out some important group formation problems, such as cartel or association agreements in industrial organization (Bloch, 1995;Belleflamme, 2000), custom unions (Yi, 1997) or environmental agreements (Chandler and Tulkens, 1997;Ray and Vohra, 2001). Note that we use the term "group formation" here rather than "coalition formation", which covers strategic settings where independent players have the opportunity to form coalitions and make bidding agreements.…”
Section: Non-cooperative Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%