2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta00095b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable and improved visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution using copper(ii)–organic frameworks: engineering the crystal structures

Abstract: Different crystal structures of copper–organic frameworks were constructed and served as broad-spectrum photocatalysts in the absence of any added cocatalyst and photosensitizer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, the photocatalytic activity of 1′ is comparable with the reported metal‐organic framework {[Cu I Cu II 2 (DCTP) 2 ]NO 3 · 1.5DMF} n (32 μmol · g –1 · h –1 ) [DCTP = 4′‐(3,5‐dicarboxyphenyl)‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine] and lower than the other Cu II ‐based CPs [Cu(RSH)(H 2 O)] n (7.88 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) (RSH = RhB derivatives), [Cu(DSPTP)] n (1.40 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) [DSPTP = 4′‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐3,2′:6′,3′′‐terpyridine], [Cu(HL) 2 (NH 2 ‐BDC)] n (2.34 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) (NH 2 ‐BDC = 2‐amino‐1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate), and [Cu(HL) 2 (BDC)] n (1.06 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) [HL = 4′‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine and BDC = 1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate] . The varied catalytic activities of these photocatalysts are significantly dominated by the vacant site of the active central Cu I/II atom, the bandgap with the redox potential, the skeleton of π‐conjugated terpyridyl ligands or RhB derivatives as well as the collaboration between organic ligands and central Cu I/II atoms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, the photocatalytic activity of 1′ is comparable with the reported metal‐organic framework {[Cu I Cu II 2 (DCTP) 2 ]NO 3 · 1.5DMF} n (32 μmol · g –1 · h –1 ) [DCTP = 4′‐(3,5‐dicarboxyphenyl)‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine] and lower than the other Cu II ‐based CPs [Cu(RSH)(H 2 O)] n (7.88 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) (RSH = RhB derivatives), [Cu(DSPTP)] n (1.40 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) [DSPTP = 4′‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐3,2′:6′,3′′‐terpyridine], [Cu(HL) 2 (NH 2 ‐BDC)] n (2.34 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) (NH 2 ‐BDC = 2‐amino‐1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate), and [Cu(HL) 2 (BDC)] n (1.06 mmol · g –1 · h –1 ) [HL = 4′‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine and BDC = 1,4‐benzenedicarboxylate] . The varied catalytic activities of these photocatalysts are significantly dominated by the vacant site of the active central Cu I/II atom, the bandgap with the redox potential, the skeleton of π‐conjugated terpyridyl ligands or RhB derivatives as well as the collaboration between organic ligands and central Cu I/II atoms.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The highly catalytic efficiency and long‐term durability of these photocatalysts have been becoming the key scientific issues in the photocatalytic field, which play vital roles for the feasible applications of clean and sustainable hydrogen energy. Very recently, several Cu I/II ‐based CPs incorporated with terpyridyl and RhB derivatives have exhibited considerable hydrogen production rates ranging from 32 μmol · g –1 · h –1 to 7.88 mmol · g –1 · h –1 . In these CP‐based photocatalysts, the central Cu I/II atoms serve importantly as active sites and π‐delocalized backbone of the ligands can essentially broaden the light absorption and facilitate the charge transfer from catalyst to water molecule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reaction was stopped every 4 h. As shown in Figure a, the photocatalytic H 2 evolution was maintained for seven repeated runs without adding a sacrificial agent in the photocatalytic experimental period, which indicated good stability and recycling performance by CN (G/T). Furthermore, analysis of the XRD patterns and FTIR spectra of CN (G/T) after this experiment (Figure S20) also indicated its good stability …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, analysiso ft he XRD patterns and FTIR spectra of CN (G/T) after this experiment ( Figure S20) also indicatedi ts good stability. [36] The transfer,m igration, andr ecombination of the photogenerated electron-hole pairs were investigated by following the photoluminescence (PL) emission spectrum in detail. [37] The shapes of the emission spectra of CN (B), CN (G/S), and CN (G/ T) were observed to be similar,a nd each contained ab road emission band centered at aw avelength of approximately 450 nm (Figure 4b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…[88][89][90] Because of their large surface area, it is beneficial to the adsorption of reactants, facilitating catalytic reactions. MOFs as photocatalysts also show great prospects in various applications, such as hydrogen evolution, [91][92][93][94][95][96] pollutants degradation, [97][98][99][100] CO 2 reduction, [101][102][103][104][105] and organic conversion. [106][107][108] So far, there are reviews on MOFs photocatalysts, [109][110][111][112][113][114] focusing on the role of MOFs in photocatalysis, which is defined as a photocatalyst or cocatalyst.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%