2018
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2018.00056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable and Efficient Time Integration of a Dynamic Pore Network Model for Two-Phase Flow in Porous Media

Abstract: We study three different time integration methods for a dynamic pore network model for immiscible two-phase flow in porous media. Considered are two explicit methods, the forward Euler and midpoint methods, and a new semi-implicit method developed herein. The explicit methods are known to suffer from numerical instabilities at low capillary numbers. A new time-step criterion is suggested in order to stabilize them. Numerical experiments, including a Haines jump case, are performed and these demonstrate that st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we briefly describe the pore network model used in this study. For a more detailed description of the model and the numerical methods used to solve it, the reader is referred to [13]. An in-depth discussion of a slightly different model, which is also of the Aker type [7], can be found in [14].…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, we briefly describe the pore network model used in this study. For a more detailed description of the model and the numerical methods used to solve it, the reader is referred to [13]. An in-depth discussion of a slightly different model, which is also of the Aker type [7], can be found in [14].…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close to the nodes, they are subject to additional models that account for interface interactions in the nodes. This is described in [13].…”
Section: Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations