2007
DOI: 10.1109/jsac-ocn.2007.025606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilizing deflection routing in optical burst switched networks

Abstract: Abstract-This paper studies the blocking performance of optical burst switching (OBS) networks using a sequential office control (SOC) state-independent deflection routing policy. We show that unprotected deflection routing may destabilize OBS resulting in higher blocking probabilities than if bursts were not deflected but simply blocked. This study was motivated by the well-known destabilizing effect that alternative routing has on circuit switching in classical telephony networks. We propose two forms of pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This wavelength reservation scheme alleviates the destabilizing effect and increases the throughput at high loads. Preemptive priority is a similar method in which a first-choice burst is given the right to preempt a reservation that has been scheduled for a deflected burst [19]. Preemptive priority has a negligible effect on blocking during stable periods and guarantees protection against destabilization during overloads.…”
Section: Limited Deflection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This wavelength reservation scheme alleviates the destabilizing effect and increases the throughput at high loads. Preemptive priority is a similar method in which a first-choice burst is given the right to preempt a reservation that has been scheduled for a deflected burst [19]. Preemptive priority has a negligible effect on blocking during stable periods and guarantees protection against destabilization during overloads.…”
Section: Limited Deflection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption has been used extensively in the technical literature dealing with performance evaluation of OBS networks, e.g. [9,10,[12][13][14]20]. The inherent simplicity given by this assumption makes us focus on evaluating how the different network and node parameters affect the network performance.…”
Section: Traffic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the technical literature does not provide yet an analogous understanding of the effect of optical buffering in OBS networks. On the routing issue, deflection routing applied to OBS has been already reported in [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], albeit without, or just partially, outlining the combined effect with node buffering. Several contention resolution schemes, including buffering and deflection, have been compared for traffic performance [15]; however, they refer to an OPS scenario quite different from an OBS one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eq. (8) can be solved for after replacing by as follows: (10) Similarly (9) can be simplified after replacing : (11) Substituting found in (10) into (11), we end up with the following equality: (12) Eq. (12) should be solved for maximum for which the following inequality inherited from (10) is satisfied: (13) The computations of the maximum value of for which (12) can be solved such that (13) is satisfied do not have a simple closed form solution.…”
Section: Appendix II Upper Bound Calculation Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common technique for contention resolution in OBS networks is wavelength conversion [9], [10] although other contention resolution techniques such as fiber delay lines (FDL) [11] or deflection routing can also be used [12]. We assume in the current paper that the OBS system employs only full wavelength conversion for contention resolution where a burst arriving on a certain wavelength can be switched onto any other idle wavelength towards its destination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%