1998
DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilizing and directional female choice for male calls in the European green toad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
79
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a strong preference for lower-frequency calls in Hyla ebraccata when the difference between stimuli was less than 2 SD of the study population (Wollerman 1998); comparable preference patterns were found in Alytes (Márquez 1995). Castellano and Giacoma (1998) found weak preference for lower-frequency calls in Bufo viridis when the alternatives were a medium-versus a higher-frequency call, but there was a strong preference for medium-frequency calls when the alternative stimulus was lower than the minimum value observed in the population. Their results together with those of Már-quez and Bosch (1997) indicate that selection for low frequencies in the species they tested is not open ended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…There was a strong preference for lower-frequency calls in Hyla ebraccata when the difference between stimuli was less than 2 SD of the study population (Wollerman 1998); comparable preference patterns were found in Alytes (Márquez 1995). Castellano and Giacoma (1998) found weak preference for lower-frequency calls in Bufo viridis when the alternatives were a medium-versus a higher-frequency call, but there was a strong preference for medium-frequency calls when the alternative stimulus was lower than the minimum value observed in the population. Their results together with those of Már-quez and Bosch (1997) indicate that selection for low frequencies in the species they tested is not open ended.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Thus, mismatches can occur in two ways: through an openended preference function where females prefer extreme trait values or through a unimodal preference function where trait values below and above are less attractive to females, but the population preference mean is displaced from the population trait mean. These two preference functions have been termed`directional' and`stabilizing', respectively (Ritchie 1996;Castellano & Giacoma 1998;Wollerman 1998) due to the predicted selective pressures on males. However, unimodal functions mismatched to the population trait mean may also result in directional selection on male signals.…”
Section: (C) Preference^trait Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we investigate Gerhardt's (1991) pattern in crickets, providing a phylogenetically independent comparison to frogs (Gerhardt et al 1996;Castellano & Giacoma 1998;Wollerman 1998). Like frogs, female crickets exhibit positive phonotaxis to a male calling song to initiate the courtship sequence (Ewing 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of sexual selection, this form of preference function represents stabilizing selection if the match with the mean is very close or weakly directional selection if the preferred range is somewhat higher or lower than the mean. Unimodal preference functions are typical for static properties such as carrier frequency (e.g., Doherty and Gerhardt 1984b;Gerhardt 1991Gerhardt , 2005aGrafe 1997;Márquez and Bosch 1997;Castellano and Giacoma 1998) and pulse rate (e.g., Arak 1988;Castellano and Giacoma 1998;Bush et al 2001;Fig. 5.5).…”
Section: Unimodal Preference Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%