2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilizing a Flexible Interdomain Hinge Region Harboring the SMB Binding Site Drives uPAR into Its Closed Conformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ligand loading/unloading loop [49] of residues 131-140 in DII domain was found to be disordered in the current structure of the unoccupied muPAR (Fig. 1C) as was the case in the three structures solved for huPAR in the absence of bound uPA [25,49,50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ligand loading/unloading loop [49] of residues 131-140 in DII domain was found to be disordered in the current structure of the unoccupied muPAR (Fig. 1C) as was the case in the three structures solved for huPAR in the absence of bound uPA [25,49,50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Notwithstanding this proposition, two crystal structures of uPAR were actually solved without any bound uPA shielding this hydrophobic cavity from solvent exposure. Importantly, both two structures were structurally constrained either by (a) a monoclonal antibody (8B12) stabilizing the DI-DII boundary thus mimicking vitronectin binding [50] and/or (b) the presence of engineered extra disulfide bond (H47C-N259C) [69] covalently tethering DI to DIII, which structurally and functionally mimics uPA-occupied uPAR [49].…”
Section: Model Of Unoccupied Muparmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) failed to promote the release and because an antibody (8B12) binding to the VN epitope in uPAR [25] also prevented release ( Fig 4C). The mode of action of the different compounds/ mutations utilized is depicted in Fig 4B.…”
Section: R91amentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The release of VN fragments was caused by cleavage within the RGD motif as it was impaired by the R45A substitution (Appendix Fig S3B). Furthermore, the release mediated by tc-uPA requires the following: (i) uPAR expression, as mock-transfected cells did not induce release; (ii) uPA binding to uPAR, as the release was impaired by the GFD domain of uPA; (iii) uPAR binding to VN, as cells expressing a VN binding-deficient uPAR mutant (uPAR R91A ) failed to promote the release and because an antibody (8B12) binding to the VN epitope in uPAR [25] also prevented release ( Fig 4C). The mode of action of the different compounds/ mutations utilized is depicted in Fig 4B. Similar results were observed for the treatment with sc-uPA, plasminogen and a2AP ( Fig EV4), even if the inhibition by GFD and the impairment by the uPAR 91 R?A substitution in this case were only partial.…”
Section: Upar Accelerates the Cleavage Of Matrix Vn By Upa And Plasminmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epitope binning of GPIHBP1 mAbs was performed with a Bi-acore3000 (GE Healthcare Life Science), as described (17).…”
Section: An Elisa To Detect Gpihbp1 In Human Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%