2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2ra01183b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilized cycling performance of silicon oxide anode in ionic liquid electrolyte for rechargeable lithium batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simple fabrication, scalability, low volume expansion and structural robustness of our previously reported nSi-cPAN architecture 19 make it an ideal candidate to merge with a suitable electrolyte system. In pursuit of a stable Si-electrolyte interface, the nSi-cPAN composite was cycled under galvanostatic conditions in RTILs comprising cation-anion combinations known for their cathodic stabilities against various negative electrode materials [29][30][31]36,[40][41][42] . The cycling performances of the Si-based electrode in RTIL solutions, including PYR 13 FSI (1.2 M LiFSI), PYR 13 TFSI (0.6 M LiTFSI) and EMIMFSI (1.2 M LiFSI), were directly compared with the electrode performance in the commercial EC/DEC (1 M LiPF 6 ) electrolyte.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The simple fabrication, scalability, low volume expansion and structural robustness of our previously reported nSi-cPAN architecture 19 make it an ideal candidate to merge with a suitable electrolyte system. In pursuit of a stable Si-electrolyte interface, the nSi-cPAN composite was cycled under galvanostatic conditions in RTILs comprising cation-anion combinations known for their cathodic stabilities against various negative electrode materials [29][30][31]36,[40][41][42] . The cycling performances of the Si-based electrode in RTIL solutions, including PYR 13 FSI (1.2 M LiFSI), PYR 13 TFSI (0.6 M LiTFSI) and EMIMFSI (1.2 M LiFSI), were directly compared with the electrode performance in the commercial EC/DEC (1 M LiPF 6 ) electrolyte.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative electrolyte compositions [28][29][30][31] and active material surface treatments 32 have been studied in the effort to enhance SEI formation on high-capacity anode materials and improve half-cell CEs. In spite of these efforts, the CEs achieved throughout cycling are still insufficient for a long-lasting Si-based full-cell 31,[33][34][35] or the methods employed to manufacture the full-cells introduce large excesses of Li þ (4200%) into the system that serve to counterbalance the cell efficiency losses over long-term cycling [36][37][38] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This nanohybrid shows a specific capacity in excess of 900 mA h g À1 after 50 discharge-charge cycles and a high Coulombic efficiency of 99.7 % at a rate of 1 C. Although plum-pudding nanohybrids have been found to be an effective structure for improving the electrochemical properties of the M IVA elements, their fabrication is not easy. In this context, many oxides, sulfides, or oxysulfides, including SiO x , [63][64][65][66] SnO 2 , [30,31,34,35,67,68] SnS, [69][70][71] SnS 2 , [72][73][74][75] and SnS 2 /SnO 2 , [76] have been studied as high-capacity anodes with improved cycling performance compared with their pristine elements. During the initial lithium-uptake process, the M IVA X a Y b compound can lithiate electrochemically, thus leading to the in situ formation of inactive components, which can also serve as the expected matrices to buffer the volume variation upon subsequent cycles.…”
Section: Plum-pudding Nanohybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that surface layer derived from TFSA-based ionic liquids is composed of lithium fluoride (LiF), lithium carbonate (Li 2 CO 3 ), lithium sulfate (Li 2 SO 4 ), and lithium sulfite (Li 2 SO 3 ). 23 The Si electrodes in PP1MEM-TSFA and PP16-TFSA gave better cyclability: the capacities of over 1000 mA h g −1 were maintained even after 100th cycle. We were able to confirm the excellent reproducibility of anode performances in each case, and an advantage of utilization of ionic liquid electrolyte are obvious throughout the 100 cycles test (Figure 7).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%