2005
DOI: 10.1002/j.0022-0337.2005.69.11.tb04023.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization Splint Therapy for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Myofascial Pain: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The aim of this review is to establish the effectiveness of stabilization splint (SS) therapy in reducing symptoms in patients with myofascial pain. Searching of electronic databases, handsearching of relevant key journals, and screening of reference lists of included studies were undertaken. There was no language restriction, and unpublished research was sought. The selection criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing splint therapy to either no treatment or another active treatment. Data extraction… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
69
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Systematic reviews on TMD treatments covered the arguments of the effectiveness of several treatment modalities, viz., occlusal treatments ( n = 5) (45, 81, 83, 84, 123), orthognathic surgery ( n = 2) (124, 125), arthrocentesis ( n = 2) (125, 126), NTI‐tss devices ( n = 1) (127), simple versus multimodal therapies ( n = 1) (128), any intervention’s effect on quality of life ( n = 1) (129), exercise and relaxation therapy ( n = 1) (130), physical therapy ( n = 1) (131), pharmacological therapy ( n = 1) (132), total TMJ prosthesis ( n = 1) (27) (Table 2).…”
Section: Evidence‐based Knowledge On Tmd Diagnosis and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Systematic reviews on TMD treatments covered the arguments of the effectiveness of several treatment modalities, viz., occlusal treatments ( n = 5) (45, 81, 83, 84, 123), orthognathic surgery ( n = 2) (124, 125), arthrocentesis ( n = 2) (125, 126), NTI‐tss devices ( n = 1) (127), simple versus multimodal therapies ( n = 1) (128), any intervention’s effect on quality of life ( n = 1) (129), exercise and relaxation therapy ( n = 1) (130), physical therapy ( n = 1) (131), pharmacological therapy ( n = 1) (132), total TMJ prosthesis ( n = 1) (27) (Table 2).…”
Section: Evidence‐based Knowledge On Tmd Diagnosis and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for oral appliances, which are the most widely diffused therapeutic modality for TMD, evidence for their subjective effectiveness seems to be supported by the systematic reviews (45, 81, 83, 123), but they are not unequivocally superior to either treatments. Oral appliances have been also the subject of a recent comprehensive review (133), which suggested that many of the available types of splints and appliances may be reasonably efficacious in the clinical setting, even though the actual mechanism through which they provide pain relief are not well known.…”
Section: Evidence‐based Knowledge On Tmd Diagnosis and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some short‐term randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have found evidence of the pain‐relieving effect of SS versus other treatment methods or no treatment on TMD pain, both of arthrogeneous and myogenous origin . On the other hand, some studies have shown that there is only a small or no additional benefit on TMD pain relief with SS treatment versus placebo, control splints (eg non‐occluding splint) or other treatment methods (eg acupuncture, counselling, masticatory muscle exercises) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mouth opening was measured on first appointment, second appointment and last appointment and all patients were given stabilization splint. 12,3…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%