Abstract:Herein, we report the stabilization of nitrene reagents as the source of a nitrogen atom to synthesize nitrogen‐incorporated R1LSi‐N←SiLR2 (1) [L=PhC(NtBu)2; R1=NTMS2, R2=NTMS]. Compound 1 is synthesized by reacting LSi(I)‐SiIL with 3.1 equivalents of Me3SiN3 at low temperature to afford a triene‐like structural framework. Whereas the reaction of the LSi(I)‐SiIL with 2.1 equivalents of Me3SiN3 at room temperature produced silaimine 2 with a central four‐membered Si2N2 ring which is accompanied by a silylene LS… Show more
“…The unligated Si(I)-based disilylene species I shows stoichiometry-dependent reactivity toward trimethylsilyl azide, forming either a silaazatriene or a silaimine product. , Roesky and co-workers described ring opening of their disilaborirane species VI with TMSN 3 , forming a 1-aza-2,3-disila-4-boretidine derivative (Scheme ). We observed selective conversion of 3 with 1 equiv of TMSN 3 to give the unique azide adduct 4 after 1 h at 40 °C in benzene solution.…”
In this paper, we report the synthesis of a unique silicon(I)-based
metalla-disilirane and report on its reactivity toward TMS-azide and
benzophenone. Metal complexes containing disilylenes ((bis)silylenes
with a Si–Si bond) are known, but direct ligation of the Si(I)
centers to transition metals always generated dinuclear species. To
overcome this problem, we targeted the formation of a mononuclear
iron(0)–silicon(I)-based disilylene complex via templated synthesis,
starting with ligation of two Si(II) centers to iron(II), followed
by a two-step reduction. The DFT structure of the resulting η
2
-disilylene-iron complex reveals metal-to-silicon π-back
donation and a delocalized three-center–two-electron (3c–2e)
aromatic system. The Si(I)–Si(I) bond displays unusual but
well-defined reactivity. With TMS-azide, both the initial azide adduct
and the follow-up four-membered nitrene complex could be isolated.
Reaction with benzophenone led to selective 1,4-addition into the
Si–Si bond. This work reveals that selective reactions of Si(I)–Si(I)
bonds are made possible by metal ligation.
“…The unligated Si(I)-based disilylene species I shows stoichiometry-dependent reactivity toward trimethylsilyl azide, forming either a silaazatriene or a silaimine product. , Roesky and co-workers described ring opening of their disilaborirane species VI with TMSN 3 , forming a 1-aza-2,3-disila-4-boretidine derivative (Scheme ). We observed selective conversion of 3 with 1 equiv of TMSN 3 to give the unique azide adduct 4 after 1 h at 40 °C in benzene solution.…”
In this paper, we report the synthesis of a unique silicon(I)-based
metalla-disilirane and report on its reactivity toward TMS-azide and
benzophenone. Metal complexes containing disilylenes ((bis)silylenes
with a Si–Si bond) are known, but direct ligation of the Si(I)
centers to transition metals always generated dinuclear species. To
overcome this problem, we targeted the formation of a mononuclear
iron(0)–silicon(I)-based disilylene complex via templated synthesis,
starting with ligation of two Si(II) centers to iron(II), followed
by a two-step reduction. The DFT structure of the resulting η
2
-disilylene-iron complex reveals metal-to-silicon π-back
donation and a delocalized three-center–two-electron (3c–2e)
aromatic system. The Si(I)–Si(I) bond displays unusual but
well-defined reactivity. With TMS-azide, both the initial azide adduct
and the follow-up four-membered nitrene complex could be isolated.
Reaction with benzophenone led to selective 1,4-addition into the
Si–Si bond. This work reveals that selective reactions of Si(I)–Si(I)
bonds are made possible by metal ligation.
“…Without doubt, the most studied 1,2‐disilylene is the three‐coordinate, amidinate‐ligated compound, [{PhC(NBu t ) 2 }Si] 2 , which was reported by Roesky and co‐workers in 2009 [3] . Since that time, this compound has been utilized in a remarkable array of reactions, most notably for the reductive activation of numerous unsaturated small molecule substrates [2, 4] . As far as we are aware, the only other structurally characterized amidinate‐stabilized 1,2‐disilylene, is the bulkier, deep blue system, [{ArC(NDip) 2 }Si] 2 1 (Dip=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl, Ar=4‐C 6 H 4 Bu t ), reported by our group in 2011 [5] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Since that time, this compound has been utilized in a remarkable array of reactions, most notably for the reductive activation of numerous unsaturated small molecule substrates. [2,4] As far as we are aware, the only other structurally characterized amidinate-stabilized 1,2-disilylene, is the bulkier, deep blue system, [{ArC(NDip) 2 }Si] 2 1 (Dip = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl, Ar = 4-C 6 H 4 Bu t ), reported by our group in 2011. [5] In contrast to [{PhC(NBu t ) 2 }Si] 2 , the reactivity of 1 has been poorly studied.…”
Reaction of the 1,2‐disilylene, [{ArC(NDip)2}Si]2 1 (Dip=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl, Ar=4‐C6H4But), with CO proceeds via insertion of CO into one Si−N bond, and Si−Si bond cleavage, to cleanly give the bis(silylene), {ArC(NDip)2}Si(:)OnormalCnormalSnormali(:)(normalNnormalDnormalinormalp)2normalC‾
Ar 2, under ambient conditions. The reaction can be partially reversed when solutions of 2 are subjected to UV irradiation. The five‐membered heterocyclic fragment of 2 represents the first silicon analogue of an “abnormal” N‐heterocyclic carbene (aNHC), a view which is substantiated by a computational analysis of the compound. Reaction of 2 with [Mo(CO)6] under UV light affords the chelate complex, [Mo(CO)4(κ2‐Si,Si‐2)] 3, while reaction with [Fe(CO)5] gives the unusual silyleneyl bridged complex, [{Fe2(CO)6}{μ‐Si[(NDip)2CAr]}2] 4. The same coordination complexes can be accessed by reaction of 1 with [Mo(CO)6] or [Fe(CO)5] under UV light. As is the case for aNHCs, d‐block metal complexes of bis(silylene) 2 could prove useful as bespoke catalysts for organic transformations.
“…9 Very recently, our group studied the reaction of organic azide with bis-silylene in the different molar ratios, which resulted in the formation of different compounds (D and E) in Chart 1. 10 The reactivity of Me 3 SiN 3 azide with moieties of low-valent silicon provoked the question of whether a similar organic azide reactivity would be experimental with heavier germylene analogues. 4a As we know, the low-valent Si species are susceptible to converting into Si IV via oxidation.…”
Herein,
we describe the redox reaction of bis(germylene)
PhC(N
t
Bu)2Ge–Ge(N
t
Bu)2CPh with different equivalents
of Me3SiN3 affording two distinct products.
The reaction
of Me3SiN3 with bis-germylene in a 1:1 molar
ratio results in compound 1 at −78 °C; however,
treatment of bis-germylene with a 2.1 equiv of Me3SiN3 at room temperature results in compound 2. The
formation of 1 and 2 can be rationalized
by two successive 3 + 1 cycloadditions of Me3SiN3 with the germanium center of bis(germylene) and N2 elimination.
All of the compounds are well-characterized by various spectroscopic
techniques and single-crystal X-ray structural analyses. Density functional
theory (DFT) calculations suggest that compound 2 has
a dicoordinated nitrogen atom, which is stabilized by hyperconjugative
interactions, resulting in pseudo-germylimine moiety. However, the
dicoordinated nitrogen atom shows high basicity as indicated by proton
affinity values. These are rare examples of isolated products that
show insertion as well as simultaneous redox properties of bis(germylene).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.