1982
DOI: 10.1021/bi00268a033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of protein structure by sugars

Abstract: The preferential interaction of proteins with solvent components was measured in aqueous lactose and glucose systems by using a high precision densimeter. In all cases, the protein was preferentially hydrated; i.e., addition of these sugars to an aqueous solution of the protein resulted in an unfavorable free-energy change. This effect was shown to increase with an increase in protein surface area, explaining the protein stabilizing action of these sugars and their enhancing effect of protein associations. Cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

41
666
2
6

Year Published

1992
1992
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,050 publications
(716 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
41
666
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This should have as consequences a reduction of the exclusion and a less positive perturbation of the PEG chemical potential by the protein, just as is observed. This effect of pH on the preferential interactions is strikingly opposite to the effect of glucose on the preferential hydrations of BSA at pH 3.0 and 6.0 (Arakawa & Timasheff, 1982a). Contrary to the current observations with the PEGs, for the sugar solution system the hydration is larger at the lower pH.…”
Section: As Well As the Appendix Of Arakawa Et Al (1990a)contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This should have as consequences a reduction of the exclusion and a less positive perturbation of the PEG chemical potential by the protein, just as is observed. This effect of pH on the preferential interactions is strikingly opposite to the effect of glucose on the preferential hydrations of BSA at pH 3.0 and 6.0 (Arakawa & Timasheff, 1982a). Contrary to the current observations with the PEGs, for the sugar solution system the hydration is larger at the lower pH.…”
Section: As Well As the Appendix Of Arakawa Et Al (1990a)contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This is done by multiplying the calculated value of (apz/am3);,,,, by the ratio, R , of the experimental to the calculated value determined for systems that show no evidence of binding. In previous studies, it has been shown that R has values between 0.5 and 0.7 (Arakawa & Timasheff, 1982a, 1983, 1984b, which are similar to those calculated by Honig and co-workers from geometric considerations Sharp et al, 1991). Therefore, for consistency, all the preferential interaction parameters calculated with the Gibbs adsorption isotherm were corrected by this factor.…”
Section: Separation Of the Measured Preferential Exclusion Into Contrsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…RNaseA was further purified on a sulfoethyl-Sephadex C25 column, according to Crestfield et al (1962). The protein was deionized exhaustively by dialyzing against doubly distilled water or passing through a mixed-bed ion exchange resin (Amberlite MB-1) and finally lyophilized (Gekko & Timasheff, 1981;Arakawa & Timasheff, 1982a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations