2000
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128<1937:sonvds>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of Nonlinear Vertical Diffusion Schemes in the Context of NWP Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roughness lengths over sea are computed using the Charnock formula with an additional gustiness stability-dependent term. An antifibrillation scheme (Bénard et al, 2000) is applied to prevent instabilities linked to the stiffness of the coupled equations resulting from the scheme.…”
Section: Physical Parameterizations and Interface To Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughness lengths over sea are computed using the Charnock formula with an additional gustiness stability-dependent term. An antifibrillation scheme (Bénard et al, 2000) is applied to prevent instabilities linked to the stiffness of the coupled equations resulting from the scheme.…”
Section: Physical Parameterizations and Interface To Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further consequence of the stiffness of the problem (Kalnay and Kanamitsu, 1988;Girard and Delage, 1990;Bénard et al, 2000) arises when the diffusion coefficient is a function of the variables on which the diffusion operator is itself acting -as is the case for planetaryboundary-layer schemes. The resulting nonlinearity can then lead to numerical instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that in the realistic models vertical diffusion is most often treated in an over-implicit way to avoid nonlinear instabilities (Bénard et al, 2000). This kills the second-order accuracy in both the AAA models and in IFS which in practice runs with (ξ, ν, µ I , µ I I ) = (1/2, 0, 3/2, 3/2) not satisfying the accuracy condition in (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%