2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2021.107273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of MT-HVDC grids via passivity-based control and convex optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the impact of the droop resistance under primary control was analyzed using conventional PI controllers. In [21], the optimal operation and stabilization of MT-HVDC systems were proposed via passivity-based control and convex optimization. Other controllers have been proposed, such as the power-sharing controls [22,23], feedback nonlinear control based on the Lyapunov theory [24], predictive fuzzy control model [25], Kalman filter control [26], model predictive control [27].…”
Section: Review Of the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the impact of the droop resistance under primary control was analyzed using conventional PI controllers. In [21], the optimal operation and stabilization of MT-HVDC systems were proposed via passivity-based control and convex optimization. Other controllers have been proposed, such as the power-sharing controls [22,23], feedback nonlinear control based on the Lyapunov theory [24], predictive fuzzy control model [25], Kalman filter control [26], model predictive control [27].…”
Section: Review Of the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain an equivalent dynamic model for the whole MT-HVDC system Equation ( 1) is compacted with its matrix equivalent by assuming that the system has been reduced only to s nodes that include power electronic converters [21]; which generates the following general dynamic grid model.…”
Section: Mt-hvdc Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This implies the need for a primary controller for each power converter and a secondary controller to manage the system energy [9,10]. Depending on the size and utility of the MG, other levels of controller may be necessary, such as demand side management, achieving total control, and improving the efficiency of the entire system [11,12]. Generally, the aim of a MG primary controller is to keep the voltage, current, or power within a reference value fixed by the secondary controller, both working as a global controller while rejecting system disturbances, such as load changes or variations, on PV array conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%