39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 2001
DOI: 10.2514/6.2001-891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of hypersonic boundary layers by porous coatings

Abstract: A second-mode stability analysis has been performed for a hypersonic boundary layer on a wall covered by a porous coating with equally spaced cylindrical blind microholes. Massive reduction of the second mode amplication is found to be due to the disturbance energy absorption by the porous layer. This

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This uncertainty varied from shot to shot, but it ranged from §3 to §15%, depending on the slope of the transitional t. When the additional uncertainty due to density ( §8%), velocity ( §4%) and viscosity ( §5%) were factored in, the overall uncertainty in transition Reynolds number ranged from §11 to §19%, with a median of §13%. Figures 4c and 4d show that the boundary layer on the smooth surface transitions well upstream as comparedto the poroussurfaceand appearsto validatethe prediction by Fedorov et al 10 Once again, the Germain and Hornung 1 data for a similar run condition is shown for comparison with excellent agreement as to the transition location. In this particular case, the smooth surface boundary layer transitions roughly at the halfway point on the cone whereas the poroussheet boundarylayer is laminar all of the way to the end of the cone.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This uncertainty varied from shot to shot, but it ranged from §3 to §15%, depending on the slope of the transitional t. When the additional uncertainty due to density ( §8%), velocity ( §4%) and viscosity ( §5%) were factored in, the overall uncertainty in transition Reynolds number ranged from §11 to §19%, with a median of §13%. Figures 4c and 4d show that the boundary layer on the smooth surface transitions well upstream as comparedto the poroussurfaceand appearsto validatethe prediction by Fedorov et al 10 Once again, the Germain and Hornung 1 data for a similar run condition is shown for comparison with excellent agreement as to the transition location. In this particular case, the smooth surface boundary layer transitions roughly at the halfway point on the cone whereas the poroussheet boundarylayer is laminar all of the way to the end of the cone.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Because of the nature of the laser drilling process, the holes were slightly conical (taper angle of about 0.5-deg) with the small diameter exposed to the ow. The thickness of the sheet (thus, the depth of the holes) was 450 ¹m (26 gauge sheet) and followed the Fedorov et al 10 analysis that the depth of the holes be approximately 30% of the boundary-layer displacement thickness. The porous surface began at approximately148 mm from the tip of the cone as per the Fedorov et al analysis 10 using the lower branch of the neutral stability curve for the Mack mode at a frequency of 1 MHz.…”
Section: Porous Sheetmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fedorov et al have shown that the thermal admittance B has a marginal e¨ect [12]. It is consequently neglected in the present work.…”
Section: Linear Stability Theorymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The understanding of this phenomenon is of great importance because receptivity connects the amplitude of the free-stream disturbances and initial amplitude of the unstable waves 9 . Recent experimental [9][10][11][12][13] , theoretical [14][15][16][17][18][19] and computational [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] studies increased our understanding about receptivity mechanism. However it still remains as a challenging problem with practical importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%