2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of GroEL minichaperones by core and surface mutations

Abstract: We report the crystal structures of two hexa-substituted mutants of a GroEL minichaperone that are more stable than wild-type by 7.0 and 6.1 kcal mol À1 . Their structures imply that the increased stability results from multiple factors including improved hydrophobic packing, optimised hydrogen bonding and favourable structural rearrangements. It is commonly believed that protein core residues are immutable and generally optimized for energy, while on the contrary, surface residues are variable and hence unimp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence to suggest that in many cases the evolution of proteins has occurred to optimize function at the expense of stability (61-64); for example, there are exquisite stereochemical requirements for catalysis, whereas protein stability requirements usually are less onerous (61)(62)(63)(64). A serpin from a thermophilic organism represents an interesting twist to this hypothesis, as the evolutionary selection pressure is complicated by the presence of two structurally and energetically unique folded states (65).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence to suggest that in many cases the evolution of proteins has occurred to optimize function at the expense of stability (61-64); for example, there are exquisite stereochemical requirements for catalysis, whereas protein stability requirements usually are less onerous (61)(62)(63)(64). A serpin from a thermophilic organism represents an interesting twist to this hypothesis, as the evolutionary selection pressure is complicated by the presence of two structurally and energetically unique folded states (65).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this is a proven method of increasing protein stability: using an empirical approach of exploring naturally occurring variations among a family of homologous proteins, FIGURE 5: Superposition of the structures of WF59 (white bonds) and wild-type (yellow bonds) FKBP12 shown in stereo. Drawn with MolScript (Kraulis, 1991) and Raster3D (Merrit and Murphy, 1994): (a) R-helix and residues surrounding mutation site; (b) loop4 region (residues 50-54) showing the hydrogen bonds between Glu60 (R-helix) and the backbone amide NH groups of residues 51 and 53. single stabilizing mutations have been combined to create a superstable multiple mutant for the proteins: barnase (Serrano et al, 1993); GroEL apical domain (Wang et al, 2000); barstar (Schreiber et al, 1994); and p53 (Nikolova et al, 1998).…”
Section: Increased Stability Of Mutants Suggests a Tradeoff Betweenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sheettracer then employs a multi-step process to build pseudo-C a traces in each identified sheet. These steps are first illustrated using as an example one b-sheet of the apical domain of the molecular chaperonin GroEL, also known as the minichaperone 17 (PDB code 1fy9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%