2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stabilization of black cotton soil and loam soil using reclaimed asphalt pavement and waste crushed glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adetayo, et al (2021) conducted field tests with two test pits (Pits A and B) at different depths (1.5 m and 1.25 m, respectively) to evaluate the effect of WG and Cow Bone Ash and found that the MDD of the treated soil in Pit A was increased by 8.8% (from 1.7 to 1.85 g/cm3) by adding 4% WG and Cow Bone Ash. However, a further increase in the WG and Cow Bone Ash content (e.g., 8%) in the soil reduced the MDD from 1.85 to 1.76 g/cm3 (the same result obtained by [Kumar, et al, 2020]). The increase in MDD in some studies after an increase in the percentage of WG in clay soils may be attributed to an increase in the voids within the soil structure, which reduces the MDD of the WG-soil mixture (Salpadoru Tholkamudalige, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Mdd and Omcsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Adetayo, et al (2021) conducted field tests with two test pits (Pits A and B) at different depths (1.5 m and 1.25 m, respectively) to evaluate the effect of WG and Cow Bone Ash and found that the MDD of the treated soil in Pit A was increased by 8.8% (from 1.7 to 1.85 g/cm3) by adding 4% WG and Cow Bone Ash. However, a further increase in the WG and Cow Bone Ash content (e.g., 8%) in the soil reduced the MDD from 1.85 to 1.76 g/cm3 (the same result obtained by [Kumar, et al, 2020]). The increase in MDD in some studies after an increase in the percentage of WG in clay soils may be attributed to an increase in the voids within the soil structure, which reduces the MDD of the WG-soil mixture (Salpadoru Tholkamudalige, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Mdd and Omcsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…(5) To make foamed glass ceramics [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97]; (6) To make glass ceramic materials [98][99][100][101][102][103]; (7) As a replacement for the soil underneath the foundation [104] and as a soil stabilization [105,106].…”
Section: Waste Reuse Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a known method to utilize crushed waste glass mixed with construction and CDW as a covering/replacing layer to improve the bearing pressure settlement of a weak sand bed, resulting in a three-fold gain in load-bearing capacity in comparison with the same thickness of sandy soil layers [104]. Stabilization of black cotton soil and loam soil with varying percentages of RAP and crushed waste glass indicated an increase in strength and CBR values [105]. Bottle glass along with GGBFS and fly ash were used to stabilize swamp soils to increase poor soil capacity with a CBR value of 1%, and a significant improvement was observed [106].…”
Section: Waste Glass As Soil Replacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the significant techniques for enhancing soil properties is the stabilization process [12]. Soil stabilization refers to any method used to alter the qualities of natural soil to serve an engineering objective [13], whether it be mechanical, chemical [14]- [16], physical, biological, or a combination of these [16], [17]. The most important factors determining the stabilization method for problematic soils in construction projects are the type of soil foundation, the required time to complete the project, the stabilization cost relative to the project cost, and the full replacement cost of the problematic soils [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%