2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability results for 2D Navier–Stokes equations with unbounded delay

Abstract: Some results related to 2D Navier-Stokes equations when the external force contains hereditary characteristics involving unbounded delays are analyzed. First, the existence and uniqueness of solutions is proved by Galerkin approximations and the energy method. The existence of stationary solution is then established by means of the Lax-Milgram theorem and the Schauder fixed point theorem. The local stability analysis of stationary solutions is studied by several different methods: the classical Lyapunov functi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the material in fluid flow is special, then the governing equations becomes 2D incompressible Navier‐Stokes system with delay: continuous or distributed cases. For the well‐posedness and dynamic systems for 2D Navier–Stokes flow with delay, we can refer to other studies 17‐28 and some more generalized fluid flow model with delay in Li et al 29 and Lukaszewicz and Kali 30 . The pullback dynamics for the 2D Navier–Stokes flow has been presented in above literatures, but the fractal dimension and robustness of pullback attractors have not been solved till now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the material in fluid flow is special, then the governing equations becomes 2D incompressible Navier‐Stokes system with delay: continuous or distributed cases. For the well‐posedness and dynamic systems for 2D Navier–Stokes flow with delay, we can refer to other studies 17‐28 and some more generalized fluid flow model with delay in Li et al 29 and Lukaszewicz and Kali 30 . The pullback dynamics for the 2D Navier–Stokes flow has been presented in above literatures, but the fractal dimension and robustness of pullback attractors have not been solved till now.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we can refer to other studies [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and some more generalized fluid flow model with delay in Li et al 29 and Lukaszewicz and Kali. 30 The pullback dynamics for the 2D Navier-Stokes flow has been presented in above literatures, but the fractal dimension and robustness of pullback attractors have not been solved till now.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given u : (−∞, T ) → X, for each t ∈ (0, T ), we define the function u t on τ ∈ (−∞, 0]. Referring to [4,27], we now make the following assumptions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By (27), there is T > 0 such that for all r ≤ −T , which implies that for all t ≥ T and r ≤ 0, e − −t r−t γρ(θrω)dr e −2bz(θr−tω) = e 0 −t − 0 r−t γρ(θrω)dr e −2bz(θr−tω) =e 0 −t (γρ(θrω)−γρ)dr+γρt e − 0 r−t (γρ(θrω)−γρ)dr−γρ(t−r) e −2bz(θr−tω) ≤e 4 t+γρt+ 4 (t−r)−γρ(t−r) e 4 (t−r) = e 3 4 t e (γρ− 2 )r .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereafter, many scholars (e.g. in [2,5,13,15,19,26,27,41,39,42]) have studied dynamics in terms of attractors for PDEs with delays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%