2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2012.02157.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability, Responsiveness, and Reproducibility of a Visual Analog Scale for Treatment Satisfaction in Migraine

Abstract: The VAS scale described here is a responsive and easy-to-use tool for evaluating treatment satisfaction and for monitoring changes to treatment if these are required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the daily medication-taking of patients and adverse events (AEs) were recorded to determine the medication possession rate (MPR) and safety profiles. Additionally, both attending physicians and patients scored satisfaction with the current hypertension treatment at W0 and W8 using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) ( 19 ); a higher score indicated higher satisfaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the daily medication-taking of patients and adverse events (AEs) were recorded to determine the medication possession rate (MPR) and safety profiles. Additionally, both attending physicians and patients scored satisfaction with the current hypertension treatment at W0 and W8 using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) ( 19 ); a higher score indicated higher satisfaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Headache Society (IHS) classification, International Headache Criteria II (ICHD-III) was used to classify the headache subtypes [ 15 ]. The severity/ intensity of headache symptoms was based on a visual analogue scale (VAS), which has previously been shown to be valid for this purpose [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary outcome measures: ① VAS (visual analog scale) score. VAS [10] was used to assess pain intensity after the intervention. The observation time points were 5 minutes before the intervention, and 0. toms after treatment were included in the univariate analysis.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%