2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1625-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of upper face sexual dimorphism in central European populations (Czech Republic) during the modern age

Abstract: One of the most fundamental issues in forensic anthropology is the determination of sex and population affinity based on various skeletal elements. Therefore, we compared the sexual dimorphism of the upper facial skeleton from a recent Czech population (twenty-first century) with that of a population from Early Modern Age Bohemia (sixteenth to eighteenth centuries). Methods of geometric morphometrics were applied. According to the results, sexual dimorphism in terms of size, shape, and form was statistically s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The success rate of sex estimation was 86.41% based on the form of the external frontal surface and 83.49% based on its shape [19]. The method using upper face form achieved 91.1% of correctly classified Czech individuals [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The success rate of sex estimation was 86.41% based on the form of the external frontal surface and 83.49% based on its shape [19]. The method using upper face form achieved 91.1% of correctly classified Czech individuals [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sexual dimorphism is known to be influenced by both withinand among-population variability [27,28]. It is necessary to keep in mind that sexually dimorphic traits on the skull are population-specific and vary between populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, some studies have peaked to over 90% accuracy in ancestry estimation, using new approaches such as geometric morphometrics, but these methods as applied to sex estimation have yielded a much lower accuracy of ~70% (Fortes de Oliveira et al, 2012;Jiménez-Arenas & Esquivel, 2013;Murphy & Garvin, 2018;Webster & David Sheets, 2010;Zelditch, Swiderski, & David Sheets, 2012). Our study however harnesses an innovative method-machine learning (Bejdová, Dupej, Krajíček, Velemínská, & Velemínský, 2018;Bewes, Low, Morphett, Pate, & Henneberg, 2019;Gao, Geng, & Yang, 2018).…”
Section: | Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Data acquired from medical imaging modalities have been widely used in the last years. In this regard, computed tomography (CT) scans have been used in many studies on cranial sexual dimorphism [ 7 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%