1982
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1982.32.3.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of unsupported axisymmetric excavations in soft clay

Abstract: The stability of an axisymmetric excavation has been given little attention in the past, even though axisymmetric excavations are common in the construction industry. Analytical upper bound solutions for the failure of an unsupported axisymmetric excavation are presented for conditions where the soil is treated as a rigid plastic material, satisfying the Tresca yield criterion and possessing an uniform undrained shear strength. Wall failure mechanisms are found to be more critical than base failure and combine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A gap has greater potential to be formed and remain open the higher the soil strength ratio su/γ'z (Britto and Kusakabe 1982;Coffman et al 2004;Supachawarote et al An experimental investigation of Mana/Gourvenec/Randolph reverse end bearing of offshore shallow foundations 6 2005). Analytical solutions (Britto and Kusakabe 1982) indicate that the minimum strength ratio necessary for the stability of an axisymmetric excavation in soft clay varies from around 0.25 to 0.18 for unsupported excavations with an excavation depth to diameter ratio of 0.1 to 0.5.…”
Section: Gappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A gap has greater potential to be formed and remain open the higher the soil strength ratio su/γ'z (Britto and Kusakabe 1982;Coffman et al 2004;Supachawarote et al An experimental investigation of Mana/Gourvenec/Randolph reverse end bearing of offshore shallow foundations 6 2005). Analytical solutions (Britto and Kusakabe 1982) indicate that the minimum strength ratio necessary for the stability of an axisymmetric excavation in soft clay varies from around 0.25 to 0.18 for unsupported excavations with an excavation depth to diameter ratio of 0.1 to 0.5.…”
Section: Gappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical solutions (Britto and Kusakabe 1982) indicate that the minimum strength ratio necessary for the stability of an axisymmetric excavation in soft clay varies from around 0.25 to 0.18 for unsupported excavations with an excavation depth to diameter ratio of 0.1 to 0.5. A gap is unlikely to form in a deposit with strength ratio less than this value, even under significant displacements.…”
Section: Gappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While neither case exactly replicates the boundary conditions of this study, the solutions were used to provide a guideline for the targeted shear strength. The theoretical solutions indicated that su/γz > 0.275 for a plane strain cut or gap (Pastor, 1978) and more critical, 0.2 for an axisymmetric excavation with depth to diameter ratio relevant to this study (Britto & Kusakabe, 1982) For this study, a sample with su/γz (su/γ'z in the case of the saturated, inundated samples in this study) > 0.275 was targeted, the highest of the theoretical predictions, to ensure the gaps would form and remain open.…”
Section: Soil Sample Preparation and Shear Strength Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A lightly over consolidated clay was selected for the study to improve the likelihood of a vertical gap remaining stable once formed, since the ability of a gap to form and stand open increases with increase in the soil strength ratio, su/γ'z (Chen 1975, Pastor 1978, Britto & Kusakabe, 1982). Analytical solutions for the depth that an unsupported excavation can remain stable (i.e.…”
Section: Soil Sample Preparation and Shear Strength Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berezantzev (1958), Cheng and Hu (2005), Cheng et al (2007), Liu andWang (2008), and Liu et al (2009) applied slip line method to study the active/passive earth pressure against cylindrical retaining walls. Britto and Kusakabe (1982;1983), and Pastor and Turgeman (1982) applied limit analysis to study the stability of an axisymmetric excavation in cohesive soil. Kaiser and Wong (1988) combined elastoplastic solution of a circular opening with limit equilibrium to obtain closed-form solutions for the stresses and displacements around a circular shaft taking into account the effect of gravity.…”
Section: Theoretical Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%