1984
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.66b4.6746687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of union after tibial shaft fracture. Analysis by a non-invasive technique

Abstract: The stability of union following the conservative treatment of tibial shaft fractures has been examined in 157 patients by a non-invasive method. With this technique it is possible to ascertain when the fragments are united and whether the strength of union is sufficient for full weight-bearing without protection. The mean time required for union was 14.0 +/- 9.2 weeks, with a range of 4 to 48 weeks. In 31 cases union was judged to be delayed; in 22 of these, intended operations were avoided because repeated s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been used for the early detection of pseudarthrosis and also to decide the best time to dynamise the fixator and then to remove it. Other authors have established the level of 15 Nm/°as the minimal stiffness which will allow safe removal of the external fixator in human tibial fractures, and 20 Nm/°in femoral fractures [12,14,15,20]. Nevertheless, the value of stiffness is not the only criteria to allow fixator removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been used for the early detection of pseudarthrosis and also to decide the best time to dynamise the fixator and then to remove it. Other authors have established the level of 15 Nm/°as the minimal stiffness which will allow safe removal of the external fixator in human tibial fractures, and 20 Nm/°in femoral fractures [12,14,15,20]. Nevertheless, the value of stiffness is not the only criteria to allow fixator removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lthough increased age has been a known risk factor for a decreased rate of fracture healing for >30 yr, little progress has been made toward understanding the mechanisms involved. (( 1–3)) The rate of bone repair is progressively reduced with aging from the pediatric population to the elderly. (( 4)), (( 5)) Delayed healing results in an increased duration of immobilization, increases the risk of joint stiffness, and is associated with increased morbidity. (( 4)) Delayed healing also increases the risk of inadequate fracture alignment. (( 6)) However, the most significant clinical problem is the development of nonunion. Several studies have established that aging results in an overall reduction in union in numerous fractures. (( 1–4)) This population not only has an increased risk of fracture caused by reduced BMD but also has reduced fracture healing potential. Thus, for any given fracture, the morbidity is greater for the aging population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 22 late referrals presented a more complex situation. 12 fractures were grossly unstable, whereas nonunion in 7 cases was diagnosed by shift comparison (Hammer et al 1984). An average of 6 (2-13) unsuccessful surgical procedures had been done prior to referral.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint exercises were started in all patients as soon as soft-tissue conditions were stable. The stage and progress of fracture healing were followed by the technique described by Hammer et al (1984) and Hammer (1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%