2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.84.503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of Si-Interstitial Defects: From Point to Extended Defects

Abstract: Trends in the growth of extended interstitial defects are extracted from extensive tight-binding and ab inito local density approximation simulations. With an increasing number of interstitials, the stable defect shape evolves from compact to chainlike to rodlike. The rodlike 311 defect, formed from (011) interstitial chains, is stabilized as it grows, elongating in the chain direction. Accurate parametrization of the defect-formation energy on the number of interstitials and interstitial chains, together with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
71
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
71
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The I 2 and I 3 formation energies are calculated to be 2.63 and 1.99 eV, respectively ͑in excellent agreement with the values of 2.5 and 1.9 eV obtained in recent DFT-LDA calculations͒. 16 We calculate the formation energy for a Si self-interstitial to be 3.3 eV, very close to the result of 3.3-3.35 eV from other DFT-LDA calculations. 15 We also examined the possibility of boron liberation from the B-containing interstitial clusters.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The I 2 and I 3 formation energies are calculated to be 2.63 and 1.99 eV, respectively ͑in excellent agreement with the values of 2.5 and 1.9 eV obtained in recent DFT-LDA calculations͒. 16 We calculate the formation energy for a Si self-interstitial to be 3.3 eV, very close to the result of 3.3-3.35 eV from other DFT-LDA calculations. 15 We also examined the possibility of boron liberation from the B-containing interstitial clusters.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…For crystalline Si, the compact tri-interstitial cluster (I 3 ) has a formation energy ϳ0.2 eV lower than the ring cluster and 0.4 eV lower than elongated clusters. 16 Figure 1 also shows compact I 2 and I 3 clusters ͑fully relaxed structures͒. The I 2 and I 3 formation energies are calculated to be 2.63 and 1.99 eV, respectively ͑in excellent agreement with the values of 2.5 and 1.9 eV obtained in recent DFT-LDA calculations͒.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…[4][5][6][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] These studies have employed a broad range of theory to describe interatomic interactions, ranging from empirical potentials, 4,14,15 to tight binding, [16][17][18] to electronic density-functional theory ͑DFT͒. 5,6,[20][21][22][23] While there are some discrepancies between the various studies regarding the precise values and ordering of the predicted formation energies, some general conclusions can be drawn. First, it is clear that on a per-interstitial basis, and in the limit of infinite size, the formation energy of all ͕111͖ planar defects is lower than either ͕100͖ or ͕113͖ defects.…”
Section: Formation Thermodynamics For Self-interstitial Clusters-prevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various predicted structures were found to be in excellent structural agreement with microscopy observations and electronic-structure calculations. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Overall, the three different potentials employed, namely, the environment-dependent interatomic potential ͑EDIP͒, 8 Tersoff, 9 and Stillinger-Weber ͑SW͒, 10 all predicted consistent overall trends, leading to a qualitatively coherent picture for some aspects of selfinterstitial clustering in silicon. In particular, it was found that cluster morphology is sensitively dependent on both the temperature and stress within the lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in silicon, antimony impurities are vacancy diffusers and phosphorus are interstitial diffusers 1 . Therefore, self-diffusion in Si has been extensively investigated by experiments 1,2,3,4,5 and simulations 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%