1973
DOI: 10.1007/bf01436564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of Ritz procedure for nonlinear two-point boundary value problem

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we establish the stability of Ritz procedure in sense of Michlin and Tucker for a class of nonlinear two-point boundary value problems which has been considered by Vaxga, Schultz and Ciaxlet in [1 ].Varga, Ciarlet and Schultz in [1 ] have considered the numerical approximation of the solution of the following real nonlinear two-point boundary value problem:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1974
1974
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Ciarlet, Schultz, and Varga [2] and Schiop [7], we consider the numerical approximation of the solution of the real nonlinear two-point boundary value problem…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Following Ciarlet, Schultz, and Varga [2] and Schiop [7], we consider the numerical approximation of the solution of the real nonlinear two-point boundary value problem…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Schiop [7], we consider the stability of the Rayleigh-Ritz procedure for the nonlinear (or semilinear) two-point boundary value problem analysed by Ciarlet, Schultz, and Varga [2] (see w 2). After establishing some preliminaries in w 2, we show in w 3 that the proof of Schiop's stability result is only valid, if suitable assumptions about the choice of co-ordinate functions are made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ]. [r is a norm in H generated by an inner product, and if we complete the space H in this norm we obtain a Hilbert space (H, [ , Ir) (see [t], [15]). …”
Section: F(u) -----~ I"" I G(t T~ T)u(ta) U(ts) Dr mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us remark that we did not use the existence of the second derivative of the functional (2.3) as has been done by Mikhlin [3] and Schiop [5]. On the other hand, we have to assume (2.14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%