2000
DOI: 10.1214/aop/1019160331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of perpetuities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, divergence of S n implies divergence of X 1,n , see e.g. [16,Theorem 2.1]. Hence we have the identity…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, divergence of S n implies divergence of X 1,n , see e.g. [16,Theorem 2.1]. Hence we have the identity…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A sufficient condition for the almost sure (a.s.) absolute convergence of the random series k≥0 b S k η k+1 with fixed b ∈ (0, 1) is Eξ ∈ (0, ∞) and E log + |η| < ∞, see, for instance, Theorem 2.1 in [13]. This sufficient condition holds, that is, the discounted perpetuity is well-defined for all b ∈ (0, 1), under the assumptions of all our results to be formulated soon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Although a random power series is a toy example of perpetuities, transferring results from the former to the latter may be a challenge. To justify this claim, we only mention that while necessary and sufficient conditions for the a.s. convergence of random power series can be easily obtained (just use the Cauchy root test in combination with the Borel-Cantelli lemma), the corresponding result for perpetuities is highly non-trivial, EJP 26 (2021), paper 131. see Theorem 2.1 in [13] and its proof. The reason is clear: the random power series is a weighted sum of independent random variables, whereas it is not the case for perpetuities.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moment assumptions in Theorem 2.1 cannot be essentially weakened; see Goldie and Maller (1997). Of course, the Markov chain (2.4) can be defined when A n is expanding rather than contracting, but different normings are required for convergence.…”
Section: Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 99%