2003
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-03-03414-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities

Abstract: Abstract. Let (G, E) be a graph with weights {axy} for which a parabolic Harnack inequality holds with space-time scaling exponent β ≥ 2. Suppose {a xy } is another set of weights that are comparable to {axy}. We prove that this parabolic Harnack inequality also holds for (G, E) with the weights {a xy }. We also give stable necessary and sufficient conditions for this parabolic Harnack inequality to hold.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
97
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the weaker assumptions of Theorem 1.12, the resistance estimate RES( ) can still be proved as in [9,Lemma 5.1]. The Feller property is already proved in Proposition 1.11 (replacing (E, F) by (E, F(Y )), we may assume that A2 and CSA( ) hold globally).…”
Section: Harnack Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under the weaker assumptions of Theorem 1.12, the resistance estimate RES( ) can still be proved as in [9,Lemma 5.1]. The Feller property is already proved in Proposition 1.11 (replacing (E, F) by (E, F(Y )), we may assume that A2 and CSA( ) hold globally).…”
Section: Harnack Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We will apply (9) to the right side of the above estimate. We also use the Leibniz rule for the energy measure, strong locality and the fact that g D is constant on each connected component of the support of φ, and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality.…”
Section: Proposition 28mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That the EHI for C implies the COI for C is proved in almost the identical way that it is done in [2,Sect. 4].…”
Section: Proofs Of Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Let ϕ 1 be the cut-off function for B(x 0 , 2κ 2 S) given by the COI. Exactly as in the proof of [2,Prop. 5.7] we have…”
Section: Proofs Of Main Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation