2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.odw.2014.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of miniscrews with different continuous orthodontic forces as measured by cone-beam computed tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the current study showed that average miniscrews' head displacement was more than average miniscrews' tail displacement (0.6mm and 0.2mm respectively). This comes in agreement with El-Beialy et al 6 and Pongsamart P et al 25 Moreover, In the current study, miniscrew head was always displaced in the same direction of force, however, the tail displacement was either in the direction of the force (this was seen in 14 miniscrews) or in the opposite direction (which was seen in 8 miniscrew). This comes in accordance with the results of Drescher D et al 9 in their systmatic review where miniscrews' head displacement ranged from 1.0 to 4.1 mm compared to 1.0 to 1.92 mm displacement of the miniscrews' tail.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the current study showed that average miniscrews' head displacement was more than average miniscrews' tail displacement (0.6mm and 0.2mm respectively). This comes in agreement with El-Beialy et al 6 and Pongsamart P et al 25 Moreover, In the current study, miniscrew head was always displaced in the same direction of force, however, the tail displacement was either in the direction of the force (this was seen in 14 miniscrews) or in the opposite direction (which was seen in 8 miniscrew). This comes in accordance with the results of Drescher D et al 9 in their systmatic review where miniscrews' head displacement ranged from 1.0 to 4.1 mm compared to 1.0 to 1.92 mm displacement of the miniscrews' tail.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The optimal force for canine retraction was reported to be 150 to 200g 31 . Pongsamart et al concluded that the lighter the force applied to a miniscrew, the more stable the miniscrew will be 25 . Therefore, the minimum optimal force for canine retraction was used in the current study (150g).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To effectively use implant anchors, many researchers have made preoperative assessments of micro-screw implant sites by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Their results have shown that based on CBCT, cortical bone thickness and sclerotin conditions could be effectively assessed, and the percentage of successfully implanted micro-screws could be effectively increased (Prasanpong et al, 2014;Qiu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%