2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of mental disorder prevalence estimates among school-aged children and adolescents: findings from the community-based project to learn about youth-mental health (PLAY-MH) and replication-PLAY-MH (Re-PLAY-MH), 2014–2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replication analyses across the four other PLAY-MH sites showed child ADHD prevalence estimates differed by site and from state-level estimates published elsewhere (Bitsko et al, 2022). PLAY-MH prevalence estimates of parent-reported ever ADHD were higher than 2016 to 2019 NSCH state estimates for Florida (PLAY-MH: 21.2%, NSCH: 9.5%, 95% CI [7.9, 11.4]), Ohio (PLAY-MH: 29.9%, NSCH: 11.6%, 95% CI [9.9, 13.7]), and South Carolina (PLAY-MH: 28.1% and SC Re-PLAY: 24.1%, NSCH: 12.7%, 95% CI [11.0, 14.6]), but were similar for Colorado (PLAY-MH: 9.1%, NSCH: 8.9%, 95% CI [7.3, 10.8]; Bitsko et al, 2022). The age range included in NSCH estimates was 3 to 17 years, which is slightly younger than the PLAY-MH age range of 5 to 19 years and likely partially contributes to the difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Replication analyses across the four other PLAY-MH sites showed child ADHD prevalence estimates differed by site and from state-level estimates published elsewhere (Bitsko et al, 2022). PLAY-MH prevalence estimates of parent-reported ever ADHD were higher than 2016 to 2019 NSCH state estimates for Florida (PLAY-MH: 21.2%, NSCH: 9.5%, 95% CI [7.9, 11.4]), Ohio (PLAY-MH: 29.9%, NSCH: 11.6%, 95% CI [9.9, 13.7]), and South Carolina (PLAY-MH: 28.1% and SC Re-PLAY: 24.1%, NSCH: 12.7%, 95% CI [11.0, 14.6]), but were similar for Colorado (PLAY-MH: 9.1%, NSCH: 8.9%, 95% CI [7.3, 10.8]; Bitsko et al, 2022). The age range included in NSCH estimates was 3 to 17 years, which is slightly younger than the PLAY-MH age range of 5 to 19 years and likely partially contributes to the difference.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Detailed methodology for PLAY-MH is described elsewhere (Danielson et al, 2021). Briefly, PLAY-MH is a multi-state, community-based, two-stage study using parent and teacher ratings of child mental health, including participants from two time points in South Carolina (SC); with an initial sample ( N = 276) and a second larger sample referred to as the Project to Learn about Youth Replication (SC Re-PLAY; N = 571; Wanga et al, 2022), and one time point in Florida (FL; N = 293), Colorado (CO; N = 239), and Ohio (OH; N = 162). We used the largest PLAY-MH sample, SC Re-PLAY, for our primary analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected for the Project to Learn About Youth‐Mental Health (PLAY‐MH), a multi‐site, community‐based, cross‐sectional study designed to produce population‐based estimates of mental disorder prevalence, disorder co‐occurrence, and receipt of associated mental health treatment in K–12 students (aged 5–19 years). Details on the study methods and demographic characteristics of the samples have been published elsewhere (Danielson et al, 2021; Wanga et al, 2022). Data were collected using a two‐stage study design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Stage 2, parents of the sampled students completed a structured diagnostic interview that was used to identify students who met diagnostic criteria for a set of externalizing and internalizing disorders. The South Carolina site was funded for two complete iterations of data collection (PLAY‐MH and Re‐PLAY‐MH in 2014 through 2017; Wanga et al, 2022), while the other three sites collected data in one round. Only the data from the second iteration of SC data collection (Re‐PLAY‐MH) are included in this analysis because of the larger sample size in Stage 2 of the second data collection and limited availability of BASC‐2‐BESS data in Stage 1 of the first data collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation