Stability of Measures of Pain Catastrophizing and Widespread Pain Following Total Knee Replacement

Abstract

Objective. Pain catastrophizing and widespread pain are predictors of pain chronicity/severity. Gaps remain in our understanding of the extent to which each is a stable (trait) or dynamic (state) variable. We undertook this study to assess the stability of each variable from before to after total knee replacement (TKR) and whether changes are explained by pain improvements.Methods. We used data from a prospective study of TKR recipients ages ≥40 years. Questionnaires included body pain diagrams assessing widespread pain, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale. We divided subjects into widespread pain groups (0 versus 1-2 versus ≥3 pain regions) and into low and high PCS score groups (<16 versus ≥16). We assessed changes in group membership from pre-TKR to 12 months post-TKR, then compared these changes between subjects with most and least WOMAC pain improvement.Results. A total of 176 subjects completed scales at both time points; 64% were female, the mean age was 66 years, and baseline median WOMAC pain score was 40. In all, 71% of subjects in the high PCS score group improved to join the low PCS score group at follow-up. While 73 subjects (41%) changed widespread pain group, they were similarly likely to worsen and to improve. We found a statistically significant positive association of improvement in WOMAC pain score with improvement in PCS score (r = 0.31), but not widespread pain (r = -0.004).Conclusion. The PCS score reflects state-like aspects of catastrophizing that diminish along with pain. In contrast, widespread pain scores worsened and improved equally often, regardless of knee pain relief. The findings urge caution in interpreting PCS score and widespread pain as trait measures in musculoskeletal research.

Hypothetical model ignores many important pathophysiologic mechanisms in fibromyalgia

“…Longitudinal studies among people with related conditions such as chronic widespread pain (CWP) or temporomandibular disorder suggest that psychological factors are weak predictors of future pain compared to factors such as somatic amplification, interoception, prior pain, poor sleep and smoking 2,3 . Furthermore, numerous studies suggest that psychological factors often improve dramatically when pain improves -which would not be expected if this unidirectional hypothesis is correct 4,5 .…”

Dispositional and situational personal features and acute post-collision head and neck pain: Double mediation of pain catastrophizing and pain sensitivity

“…While catastrophizing has often been viewed as a personality trait that remains stable in the absence of intervention [e.g., 58 , 59 ], other findings that catastrophizing decreased following pain relief, suggest dynamic, state-like aspects [ 60 ]. Thus, the PCS, may comprise both situational and dispositional elements which are affected, among other reasons, by the instructions provided (whether relate to current or on previous pain experience) [ 61 ]. Furthermore, Sullivan et al [ 58 ] proposed that the extent to which one engages in catastrophizing might change over time as a function of stimulus cues and social responses present in the individual’s environment.…”

Rheumatology and Long COVID: lessons from the study of fibromyalgia

“…Many early studies in these conditions focused on these psychological factors being causative, since many or most individuals with a nociplastic pain condition will exhibit some form of psychological distress. But more recent studies show that many individuals with chronic pain who have high levels of depression or catastrophising have rapid improvements in these domains when they are successfully treated for their pain,23 24 suggesting a strong bidirectional relationship. When a nociplastic state is triggered by a stressor such as deployment to war, infections or trauma the typical course is that individuals begin sleeping poorly, become fatigued and less active, and develop distress since they are uncertain of whether or when they will improve.…”