Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stt913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of magnetic fields in non-barotropic stars: an analytic treatment

Abstract: Magnetic fields in upper main-sequence stars, white dwarfs, and neutron stars are known to persist for timescales comparable to their lifetimes. From a theoretical perspective this is problematic, as it can be shown that simple magnetic field configurations are always unstable. In non-barotropic stars, stable stratification allows for a much wider range of magnetic field structures than in barotropic stars, and helps stabilize them by making it harder to induce radial displacements. Recent simulations by Brait… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
181
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(67 reference statements)
4
181
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to emphasize that, because of the choice of poloidal magnetic field distributions, oblate shapes are favored for highly magnetic stars. Note, however, that several studies suggest that toroidal contributions might play an important role in the stability of magnetic stars Braithwaite & Spruit (2004), Marchant et al (2011), Lasky et al (2011), Ciolfi & Rezzolla (2013, Akgun et al (2013), Mitchell et al (2015), Armaza et al (2015), Mastrano et al (2015). Still, even in this case, we expect our qualitative results to hold.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 48%
“…It is important to emphasize that, because of the choice of poloidal magnetic field distributions, oblate shapes are favored for highly magnetic stars. Note, however, that several studies suggest that toroidal contributions might play an important role in the stability of magnetic stars Braithwaite & Spruit (2004), Marchant et al (2011), Lasky et al (2011), Ciolfi & Rezzolla (2013, Akgun et al (2013), Mitchell et al (2015), Armaza et al (2015), Mastrano et al (2015). Still, even in this case, we expect our qualitative results to hold.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 48%
“…2.2 [see Sec. 4.1 of Mastrano et al (2013)]. The task now is to obtain an algorithm for finding constants κ and functions f such that the field (4) matches the output of the Alicante code within a specified tolerance at each grid point.…”
Section: Analytic Field Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this current paper, two representatives of these different initial field configurations (which return the same polar cap field structure conducive to radio pulsar emission) are taken as an input to explore their effect on the neutron star deformation. Mastrano et al (2015) recently presented a method to calculate the deformation of a neutron star caused by poloidal-toroidal magnetic fields consisting of arbitrary multipoles [see also Mastrano et al (2013)]. In order to explore whether the magnetic spots and strong toroidal fields in radio pulsars produce an ellipticity which is potentially detectable through gravitational wave (hereafter GW) emission, we do not present an exhaustive study of magnetic field structures and their resulting ellipticities; we simply aim to convince the reader that magnetic field structures arising from Hall drift in radio pulsars may induce stellar deformations, which make them potentially detectable as GW sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect and their mutual repulsion (which results in an effective screening of the attraction of the nucleus on the outer electrons by the inner ones) makes the electron cloud bigger, resulting in most neutral atoms 1 In fact, a0 could be obtained in an even simpler way, as the only length that can be constructed from the three relevant dimensional constants in the problem, namely e, , and me. Of course this requires to first have the judgement to eliminate other constants, such as the speed of light and the mass of the nucleus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%