2022
DOI: 10.3390/cryst12121835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of FeVO4-II under Pressure: A First-Principles Study

Abstract: In this work, we report first-principles calculations to study FeVO4 in the CrVO4-type (phase II) structure under pressure. Total-energy calculations were performed in order to analyze the structural parameters, the electronic, elastic, mechanical, and vibrational properties of FeVO4-II up to 9.6 GPa for the first time. We found a good agreement in the structural parameters with the experimental results available in the literature. The electronic structure analysis was complemented with results obtained from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is due to the stronger compression of the Fe–O distances ( d Fe–O ) than the W–O distances ( d W–O ) (see Figure b). Note that W–O bonds are stronger (more ionic) than Fe–O bonds in terms of the Laplacian of the charge density at the respective bond critical point (∇ 2 ρ). , This is the reason behind the stiffness of W–O bonds in comparison to that of Fe–O bonds. On the other hand, Figure c shows that the polyhedral distortion index Δ d , calculated using the definition established by Baur, decreases with pressure for the WO 6 octahedra, but remains almost constant for FeO 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is due to the stronger compression of the Fe–O distances ( d Fe–O ) than the W–O distances ( d W–O ) (see Figure b). Note that W–O bonds are stronger (more ionic) than Fe–O bonds in terms of the Laplacian of the charge density at the respective bond critical point (∇ 2 ρ). , This is the reason behind the stiffness of W–O bonds in comparison to that of Fe–O bonds. On the other hand, Figure c shows that the polyhedral distortion index Δ d , calculated using the definition established by Baur, decreases with pressure for the WO 6 octahedra, but remains almost constant for FeO 6 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our GGA + U calculations, we chose U = 6 eV and J H = 0.95 eV. Similar values were previously used with success in the study of other iron and ABO 4 compounds. All properties computed in this study were calculated under the GGA + U approach. For the calculations, we considered nonmagnetic, ferromagnetic, and antiferromagnetic configurations.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar values have been used successfully in the study of Fe-based compounds. [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55] Calculations are also performed within the DFT-TS approximation to take into account vdW interactions [56] in the systems under study.…”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%