2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2011.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of exothermic autocatalytic fronts with regard to buoyancy-driven instabilities in presence of heat losses

Abstract: Across traveling autocatalytic fronts, density differences due to composition and temperature changes can lead to buoyancy-driven hydrodynamic instabilities deforming the front by convective motions. We study here the influence of heat losses through the walls of the reactor on the stability of such exothermic fronts in the gravity field. The stability domain is computed numerically in a parameter space spanned by the solutal R c and thermal R T Rayleigh numbers of the problem for various values of the Newton'… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the Schmidt number can vary from 1246 at T = 4 • C to 138 at T = 50 • C. We set the Schmidt number to S c = 400, which is close to experimental values for the iodate-arsenous acid systems [9]. This value can be considered constant since the change in temperature across the front is of the order of 0.1 • C. We use a Lewis number L e = 20 which is somewhat larger than typical values for the CT reaction (L e = 10) [14,15,31], but smaller than values for the IAA reaction (50 ≤ L e ≤ 70) [9,32]. In the case of an exothermic reaction with a reaction front moving upwards, the warmer fluid is underneath the front.…”
Section: Linear Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Therefore, the Schmidt number can vary from 1246 at T = 4 • C to 138 at T = 50 • C. We set the Schmidt number to S c = 400, which is close to experimental values for the iodate-arsenous acid systems [9]. This value can be considered constant since the change in temperature across the front is of the order of 0.1 • C. We use a Lewis number L e = 20 which is somewhat larger than typical values for the CT reaction (L e = 10) [14,15,31], but smaller than values for the IAA reaction (50 ≤ L e ≤ 70) [9,32]. In the case of an exothermic reaction with a reaction front moving upwards, the warmer fluid is underneath the front.…”
Section: Linear Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In the opposite scenario, when chemical fronts propagate downward, different pattern formation is observed: since the product solution has greater density, the propagating planar fronts are hydrodynamically unstable, resulting in a cellular structure. Figure a shows the spatiotemporal pattern formation that has been studied and understood in the past years both experimentally and theoretically. These structures can be characterized by their wavelength (λ) and their amplitude or mixing length ( L m ) defined as the standard deviation of the front position in the direction of front propagation. At a glance, we can find that the wavelength increases in time, while the change in the mixing length is not that obvious.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these heat losses, the temperature profile during the propagation of the front is not a front anymore but a pulse. This modification of the temperature profile can lead to a change in the stability of fronts 6,12,[19][20][21] and in their nonlinear dynamics 19,20,22 . In addition, this interferometric method has also revealed that the maximum of temperature reached in the fingered front is larger than that observed in stable planar fronts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%