2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00345.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of emotion‐modulated startle during short and long picture presentation

Abstract: Following reports on improved test-retest reliability of emotion-modulated startle during a 6-s picture presentation when different pictures are presented at each assessment (Larson et al., 2000) and data suggesting that brief picture presentations also elicit affective blink modulation (Codispoti, Bradley, & Lang, 2001), we assessed test-retest reliability of blink modulation during brief picture presentations. At two acoustic startle sessions (4 weeks apart) subjects viewed different IAPS pictures for either… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(61 reference statements)
5
51
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Arousal ratings may be lower in response to faces because emotional responses have waned due to extinction with frequent exposure to all kinds of emotional facial expressions in everyday life, without any consequences. Although extinction has been shown to reduce startle responses due to decreasing arousal (Larson et al, 2000(Larson et al, , 2005, we did observe the expected startle potentiation to angry expressions, but we did not find the expected attenuation in response to happy faces. This may indicate that under situations of low perceived arousal, the motivational system selectively supports potentially harmful stimuli, while appetitive behavior may only be initialized when strong reinforcers are present.…”
Section: Arousal Differences Between Scenes and Facescontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Arousal ratings may be lower in response to faces because emotional responses have waned due to extinction with frequent exposure to all kinds of emotional facial expressions in everyday life, without any consequences. Although extinction has been shown to reduce startle responses due to decreasing arousal (Larson et al, 2000(Larson et al, , 2005, we did observe the expected startle potentiation to angry expressions, but we did not find the expected attenuation in response to happy faces. This may indicate that under situations of low perceived arousal, the motivational system selectively supports potentially harmful stimuli, while appetitive behavior may only be initialized when strong reinforcers are present.…”
Section: Arousal Differences Between Scenes and Facescontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…These findings are consistent with the idea that briefly-presented pictures engender affective responses. For instance, similar affective responses, including increased skin conductance responses and corrugator muscle activity, have been observed with brief stimuli (300-500 ms) and while viewing unpleasant pictures for longer (6 s) durations Larson et al, 2005). …”
Section: Unpleasant Stimuli and Sustained Task Interferencementioning
confidence: 66%
“…As a further complication, the IAT may also be influenced by strategic processing (e.g., Rothermund and Wentura, 2004;Greenwald et al, 2005). Future research could use brief picture presentations that may reveal a more immediate affective response (Larson et al, 2005). Third, the estimated internal reliability of the startle-probe scores was low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%