2019
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498820500553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of depth functions of cover ideals of balanced hypergraphs

Abstract: We prove that the depth functions of cover ideals of balanced hypergraph have the nonincreasing property. Furthermore, we also give a bound for the index of depth stability of these ideals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge this is open even for bipartite graphs. Our next application extends the fact that the powers of I(G) ∨ , the ideal of covers of G, have non-increasing depth if G is bipartite [5,26,27]. An interesting example due to Kaiser, Stehlík, andŠkrekovski [38] shows that the powers of the ideal of covers of a graph does not always have non-increasing depth (Example 5.4), that is, part (b) of Corollary 5.3 fails for non-bipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge this is open even for bipartite graphs. Our next application extends the fact that the powers of I(G) ∨ , the ideal of covers of G, have non-increasing depth if G is bipartite [5,26,27]. An interesting example due to Kaiser, Stehlík, andŠkrekovski [38] shows that the powers of the ideal of covers of a graph does not always have non-increasing depth (Example 5.4), that is, part (b) of Corollary 5.3 fails for non-bipartite graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The constant value of depth(R/I k ) for k ≫ 0 is called the limit depth of I and is denoted by lim k→∞ depth(R/I k ). There are some classes of monomial ideals with non-increasing depth and non-decreasing regularity [3,5,26,27,52]. A natural way to show these properties for a monomial ideal I is to prove the existence of a monomial f such that (I k+1 : f ) = I k for k ≥ 1.…”
Section: Edge Ideals Of Clutters With Non-increasing Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%