2011
DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v3n1p271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of Demand for Money in India: Evidence from Monetary and Liquidity Aggregates

Abstract:

The determinants and stability of money demand functions, as per new definitions of monetary aggregates, has been analyzed in this paper. Quarterly Data from 1996Q2 to 2009Q2, for various monetary aggregates, interest rates, exchange rates, stock prices and GDP is in use. The cointegration tests, error correction mechanism, Granger causality and CUSUM tests has been applied for empirical analysis. The estimated results disclose the existence long-run and short-run relationship among the variables. Unidirect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, results on the stability of MDF after structural breaks in the macroeconomic series led by financial innovations in the late 1970s and 1980s are mixed in the case of India in particular and throughout the globe in general. Most of the studies support the view that money demand is stable even after economic reforms (e.g., Adil et al, 2020;Arora and Osatieraghi, 2016;Muralikrishna Bharadwaj & Pandit, 2010;Padhan, 2011 in case of India). Conversely, some studies support unstable money demand after reform (e.g., Aggarwal, 2016;Singh & Pandey, 2010 in case of India).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus, results on the stability of MDF after structural breaks in the macroeconomic series led by financial innovations in the late 1970s and 1980s are mixed in the case of India in particular and throughout the globe in general. Most of the studies support the view that money demand is stable even after economic reforms (e.g., Adil et al, 2020;Arora and Osatieraghi, 2016;Muralikrishna Bharadwaj & Pandit, 2010;Padhan, 2011 in case of India). Conversely, some studies support unstable money demand after reform (e.g., Aggarwal, 2016;Singh & Pandey, 2010 in case of India).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The effect of economic reforms on the stability of money demand was mixed. A majority of the studies support the view that money demand was stable even after economic reforms (for instance Adil, Haider, & Hatekar, 2018; Arora & Osatieraghi, 2016; Muralikrishna Bharadwaj & Pandit, 2010; Padhan, 2011). Some studies, however, find an unstable money demand after the reforms (for instance Aggarwal, 2016; Inoue & Hamori, 2009; Singh & Pandey, 2010).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To complement the diagnostic tests and ascertain further the validity of the short run and long run models, it is a common practice in the empirical literature to test for the structural stability of the parameters using the cumulative sum of recursive residuals (CUSUM) and the cumulative sum of squares of residuals (CUSUMSQ) tests developed by Brown, Durbin and Evans (1975). In this regard, this study followed Dagher and Kovanen (2011) and Padhan (2011) and applied the CUSUM and CUSUMSQ to the residuals of the error correction model reported in Table (4). These tests which are based on the cumulative sums of the estimated residuals have been intensively used for testing linear regressions; they have further been extended to nonlinear regression functions such as the threshold autoregressive (TAR) and the quadratic polynomial function models (Kirsh and Kamgaing, 2011;Tenaw and Demeke ,2020).…”
Section: Stability Testmentioning
confidence: 99%