1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0926-3373(98)00024-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of copper based catalysts enhanced by carbon dioxide in methanol decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of copper-containing catalysts the literature data concerning the role of various copper species in this process are rather controversial. Usually the participation of metallic copper is reported [11][12][13]16,[18][19][20][23][24][25][26]32,33,42,45,46] but the role of copper ions in this process is not completely clear [12,14,17,21,22,28,29,31,43,44,47,48]. In our previous studies [79][80][81][82][83][84], the nature of a catalytic active complex (CAC) of copper modified activated carbon in methanol decomposition has been discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of copper-containing catalysts the literature data concerning the role of various copper species in this process are rather controversial. Usually the participation of metallic copper is reported [11][12][13]16,[18][19][20][23][24][25][26]32,33,42,45,46] but the role of copper ions in this process is not completely clear [12,14,17,21,22,28,29,31,43,44,47,48]. In our previous studies [79][80][81][82][83][84], the nature of a catalytic active complex (CAC) of copper modified activated carbon in methanol decomposition has been discussed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the reduction in the active surface area may also affect the catalytic activity, it is estimated for Ni 3 N and Ni 3 N−Au c using TPR. The measured reduction in active surface areas are approximately 535 quantity (cm −2 g −1 STP) of Ni 3 N−Au c better than 473.5 quantity (cm −2 g −1 STP) of Ni 3 N, indicating that Ni 3 N−Au c exists stronger reducible properties than Ni 3 N . From the above mentioned, compared to Ni 3 N, the Ni 3 N−Au c cocatalyst offers photo‐generated charge carriers separation and migration ability, and also promotes reaction kinetics and improve reducing activity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Carbon deposition commonly occurs during the methane decomposition and reforming over Ni catalysts, often causing deactivation of catalysts and plugging of reaction chamber. 6,24) However, 25,26) With the exception of our studies on the Ni 3 Al foils, 11,12) there have been no report on carbon deposition over common Ni-based catalysts. The Ni 3 (Si,Ti) and Ni 3 Al foil catalysts can be categorized as Ni base catalysts because the fine Ni particles serve as catalyst in both cases, but their activity for carbon deposition is considerably different from that of the common Ni base catalysts.…”
Section: Comparison Of Catalytic Properties Betweenmentioning
confidence: 83%