2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of antibacterial modification of nanofibrous PA6/DTAB membrane during air filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AcOH colloidal solutions of CePER and CeAMM were mixed directly with polymer PA6 solution in 2:1 acetic/formic acid before electrospinning to integrate CeNPs into the nanofiber structure. XRD analysis of the pristine and CeNP-modified PA6 nanofibers shows a characteristic diffraction pattern between 16 and 26° 2θ, indicating the presence of both α and γ phases of PA6, consistent with previous findings. , Interestingly, the modification of PA6 fibers with CeNPs does not lead to smoothing and broadening of the reflection profiles due to the restriction of PA6 crystallization, which leads to the formation of smaller crystalline domains in the modified fibers, as observed previously in the case of modification of PA6 nanofibers with DTAB, BTAB, or CHX antibacterial agents. , On the contrary, both types of CeNPs in the nanofibers promote PA6 crystallization, as evident from the highly intense and sharper diffraction lines. Furthermore, diffraction lines related to CeO 2 were clearly visible in PA6 fibers modified with CeAMM, while only the most intense diffraction line belonging to the (111) planes of CeO 2 can be recognized in PA6-CePER.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…AcOH colloidal solutions of CePER and CeAMM were mixed directly with polymer PA6 solution in 2:1 acetic/formic acid before electrospinning to integrate CeNPs into the nanofiber structure. XRD analysis of the pristine and CeNP-modified PA6 nanofibers shows a characteristic diffraction pattern between 16 and 26° 2θ, indicating the presence of both α and γ phases of PA6, consistent with previous findings. , Interestingly, the modification of PA6 fibers with CeNPs does not lead to smoothing and broadening of the reflection profiles due to the restriction of PA6 crystallization, which leads to the formation of smaller crystalline domains in the modified fibers, as observed previously in the case of modification of PA6 nanofibers with DTAB, BTAB, or CHX antibacterial agents. , On the contrary, both types of CeNPs in the nanofibers promote PA6 crystallization, as evident from the highly intense and sharper diffraction lines. Furthermore, diffraction lines related to CeO 2 were clearly visible in PA6 fibers modified with CeAMM, while only the most intense diffraction line belonging to the (111) planes of CeO 2 can be recognized in PA6-CePER.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…According to the literature, using a one-step technology (i.e., antimicrobial agent DTAB in a spinning solution), a DTAB-modified antimicrobial hybrid membrane was obtained on the surface of the fibers. Antimicrobial activity has been demonstrated even at low DTAB concentrations (0.5% by weight) [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PUR nanofibers modified by the amines showed a tendency to stick to each other in bundles, and at higher concentrations, these bundles produced continuous surfaces. This behavior was not observed for short amines or other modifiers [49][50][51] and indicated the importance of the interaction energy polymer-modifier and modifier-modifier on the membrane structure. Therefore, we used molecular modeling (force field calculations) to analyze the intermolecular interactions in the PUR/TETA(TEPA) samples and to elucidate the effect observed in the HRSEM analysis (Figure 2).…”
Section: Sample MMD Nanofiber Diameter (Nm)mentioning
confidence: 89%