1994
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/267.3.629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of a relativistic rotating electron-positron jet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See, for instance, the left panel in Fig 3. For larger magnetic field strengths (case B5), we observe a stable behavior even in long term integration, as shown in the right panel of Fig 3. In the regime of strong magnetizations, in fact, the system can be well described by the force-free approximation. In this limit, our simulation results are in agreement with the findings of Istomin & Pariev (1994), (1996 who have shown that a jet with a longitudinal electric current remains stable with respect to helical as well as axially symmetric (pinch) modes. We believe that the induced stability owes to the stabilizing action of the electric field and, therefore, it has to be considered as a purely relativistic effect.…”
Section: Periodic Jet Simulationssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…See, for instance, the left panel in Fig 3. For larger magnetic field strengths (case B5), we observe a stable behavior even in long term integration, as shown in the right panel of Fig 3. In the regime of strong magnetizations, in fact, the system can be well described by the force-free approximation. In this limit, our simulation results are in agreement with the findings of Istomin & Pariev (1994), (1996 who have shown that a jet with a longitudinal electric current remains stable with respect to helical as well as axially symmetric (pinch) modes. We believe that the induced stability owes to the stabilizing action of the electric field and, therefore, it has to be considered as a purely relativistic effect.…”
Section: Periodic Jet Simulationssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results indicate that the instability is strong in the nonrelativistic or relativistic cases for M A 1, provided the magnetic azimuthal component is stronger than the longitudinal (q > 1). Instability becomes weaker for larger field strengths (M A ∼ 1) and tends to disappear when the magnetic field is strong enough (M A small) to move the system towards the force-free field limit (Istomin & Pariev, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cylindrical force-free jets are kink stable if the poloidal field is independent of the radius [65,66], but are kink unstable if the poloidal field decreases with the radius [50,53]. In a static reference frame or jet confined by rigid walls [67], the Kruskal-Shafranov criterion for instability, |B φ /B p | > 2πR/z, indicates that the instability develops if the length of a static plasma column is long enough for the field lines to go around the column at least once [68].…”
Section: Current Driven Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instability excites large scale helical motions that may disrupt the system. Cylindrical force-free jets are kink stable if the poloidal field is independent of the radius (Istomin & Pariev 1994, Istomin & Pariev 1996, but cylindrical force-free jets are kink unstable if the poloidal field decreases with the radius (Begelman 1998;Lyubarskii 1999). In the case of non-relativistic rotation, force-free jets are kink unstable if |B φ /B p | > |Ω|R/c (Tomimatsu et al 2001).…”
Section: Current Driven Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%