2010
DOI: 10.1002/num.20624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of a combined finite element ‐ finite volume discretization of convection‐diffusion equations

Abstract: We consider a time-dependent and a stationary convection-diffusion equation. These equations are approximated by a combined finite element -finite volume method: the diffusion term is discretized by CrouzeixRaviart piecewise linear finite elements on a triangular grid, and the convection term by upwind barycentric finite volumes. In the nonstationary case, we use an implicit Euler approach for time discretization. This scheme is shown to be L 2 -stable uniformly with respect to the diffusion coefficient. In ad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a framework, we could show that our discrete convection term possesses some sort of coercivity property with respect to the norm of L 2 ( Ω ) . In essence, it is this property which allowed us in to derive ν ‐independent stability estimates for solutions to (1.1)–(1.3) and (1.4), (1.5), respectively, thus generalizing earlier results in (homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions; ν Δ as principal order term in (1.1) and (1.5); b only x ‐dependent) and ( b and B constant vectors; special grids). In the present article, we do not impose (1.10), but we have to accept a term ( ν α 0 C 1 2 ) 1 / 2 in our error bounds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In such a framework, we could show that our discrete convection term possesses some sort of coercivity property with respect to the norm of L 2 ( Ω ) . In essence, it is this property which allowed us in to derive ν ‐independent stability estimates for solutions to (1.1)–(1.3) and (1.4), (1.5), respectively, thus generalizing earlier results in (homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions; ν Δ as principal order term in (1.1) and (1.5); b only x ‐dependent) and ( b and B constant vectors; special grids). In the present article, we do not impose (1.10), but we have to accept a term ( ν α 0 C 1 2 ) 1 / 2 in our error bounds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In [12], we applied this FE-FV method to problem (1.1), (1.2), using the implicit Euler method as time discretization. Under the assumption that β is constant, we showed that the approximate solution provided by this approach may be estimated in the L 2 -norm against the data, with the constant in this estimate being independent of the diffusion parameter ν.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is the aim of the work at hand to establish the stability estimates from [12] without this inconvenient condition. In fact, we will show that even if the grid is only required to be shaperegular (minimum angle condition), an upper bound independent of ν and only involving the data may still be constructed for the L 2 -norm of the approximate solution of (1.1), (1.2) and (1.4), (1.5), respectively, obtained by the FE-FV approach described above, with the implicit Euler method being used as time discretization in the unsteady case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations